From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754550Ab1HUK5i (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:57:38 -0400 Received: from mgw2.diku.dk ([130.225.96.92]:57562 "EHLO mgw2.diku.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754305Ab1HUK50 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:57:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:57:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall To: Dong Aisheng-B29396 Cc: Wolfram Sang , Liam Girdwood , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c: add missing kfree In-Reply-To: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7722212DF@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> Message-ID: References: <1313820761-12042-3-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk> <20110820134439.GA2266@pengutronix.de> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7722212DF@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Julia Lawall [mailto:julia@diku.dk] > > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 11:19 PM > > To: Wolfram Sang > > Cc: Liam Girdwood; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Mark Brown; Jaroslav > > Kysela; Takashi Iwai; Dong Aisheng-B29396; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c: add missing kfree > > > > From: Julia Lawall > > > > Move the test on pdev->id before the kzalloc to avoid requiring kfree > > when the test fails. This fix was suggested by Wolfram Sang. > > > > A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as > > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > > > // > > @@ > > identifier x; > > expression E1!=0,E2,E3,E4; > > statement S; > > iterator I; > > @@ > > > > ( > > if (...) { ... when != kfree(x) > > when != x = E3 > > when != E3 = x > > * return ...; > > } > > ... when != x = E2 > > when != I(...,x,...) S > > if (...) { ... when != x = E4 > > kfree(x); ... return ...; } > > ) > > // > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > > > > --- > > diff --git a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c index > > 0b3adae..e9a90e4 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c > > @@ -519,12 +519,11 @@ static int mxs_saif_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev) > > struct mxs_saif *saif; > > int ret = 0; > > > > + if (pdev->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_saif)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > saif = kzalloc(sizeof(*saif), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!saif) > > return -ENOMEM; > > - > > - if (pdev->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_saif)) > > - return -EINVAL; > > mxs_saif[pdev->id] = saif; > > > > saif->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > Thanks for the finding, Julia. > It's ok to me. > > BTW I guess you may need to resend a new version patch instead of following it > in this mail thread. :) > If yes, one minus thing, add one blank line below the line of 'return -ENOMEM' > may look more comfortable. OK, I will do both. Thanks, julia