From: Reiner Sailer <sailer@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: crypto api initialized late
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:15:22 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.63.0505161359560.840@laptop> (raw)
I am writing a Linux Security Module that needs SHA1 support very early in
the kernel startup (before any fs are mounted,modules are loaded, or
files are mapped; including initrd). Therefore, I use the __initcall
to initialize the security module. SHA1 can currently be used only
through the crypto-api (static definitions and hidden context structure).
This crypto-API, however, initializes AFTER the security module
code in the __initicall block. Currently, I use the following patch into
the main Linux Makefile to start up the crypto-API earlier:
diff -uprN linux-2.6.12-rc3_orig/Makefile
linux-2.6.12-rc3-ima-newpatch/Makefile
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3_orig/Makefile 2005-04-20 20:03:12.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3-ima-newpatch/Makefile 2005-05-11 15:18:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ export MODLIB
ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
-core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/
+core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ crypto/ security/
vmlinux-dirs := $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, $(init-y) $(init-m) \
$(core-y) $(core-m) $(drivers-y) $(drivers-m) \
Generally, I can think of the following solutions:
a) initialize crypto api in a initblock earlier than __initcall
b) make crypto functions global in the kernel and make crypto-api
usage optional (goes against the idea of the api)
c) re-implement SHA1 for my LSM (won't be accepted)
d) the above patch (acceptable?)
Is there a preferred/accepted way to handle this startup-sequence problem?
Reiner
next reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-16 19:15 Reiner Sailer [this message]
2005-05-16 20:03 ` Chris Wright
[not found] ` <OFBC11B5F7.2600BE34-ON85257003.006F5006-85257003.0070115B@us.ibm.com>
2005-05-16 20:40 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-16 20:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-16 20:30 Reiner Sailer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.WNT.4.63.0505161359560.840@laptop \
--to=sailer@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®