From: "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: quilt-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com>
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:18:39 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <RyUOlVAg.1139905119.2584600.khali@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602140510.54960.agruen@suse.de>
Hi all,
On 2006-02-14, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:25, Peter Williams wrote:
> > The problem arises when pushing a patch that has errors in it (due to
> > changes in the previous patches in the series) and needs the -f flag to
> > force the push. What's happening is that the reverse of the errors is
> > being applied to the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory. Then when
> > you pop this patch it returns the file to a state with the reverse of
> > the errors applied to it.
>
> Found and fixed. It's a missed rollback_patch on one of the two branches of
> the code that checks if a patch can be reverse applied. This case
> apparently doesn't trigger as easily as it seems, or else we would have
> found it sooner. Still quite bad.
I probably encountered it the other day, but as I couldn't explain what
was happening, I mistakenly concluded to a user error and started again
from a fresh tree. Or maybe it was really a user error after all.
I was about to suggest that we add a test in the quilt test suite, but I
see you did already - good!
> Shall we wait until the translations are up-to-date again, or release
> 0.44 immediately?
I'd say:
* Fix the temporary file leak in the mail command I have been reporting a
few days ago - unless it's there on purpose.
* Update the translations. I'll take care of French this evening
(GMT+01).
* Let people (including me) do a little testing. If nothing else, running
the test suite on a few different systems can't hurt.
* Release.
We can be done by tomorrow if Yashi can handle the Japanese translation
fast. If Yashi is too busy I guess we'll have to release anyway...
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060202230210.05a6ad4a.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-02-14 3:25 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 4:10 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 4:36 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 8:18 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2006-02-14 15:15 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2006-02-14 15:55 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 22:50 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=RyUOlVAg.1139905119.2584600.khali@localhost \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quilt-dev@nongnu.org \
--cc=yashi@atmark-techno.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®