From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754259Ab0ISWrP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:47:15 -0400
Received: from snt0-omc2-s12.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.87]:24345 "EHLO
	snt0-omc2-s12.snt0.hotmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753374Ab0ISWrO convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:47:14 -0400
Message-ID: <SNT125-W52BDEC78C3DED007751655C37D0@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [96.253.143.208]
From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>
To: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <cyeoh@au1.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:47:14 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20100919214802.GA22579@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20100915104855.41de3ebf@lilo>
 <AANLkTimNsDxeyZL4GVaH4L7YGO-EoRyCMHDtMPWU37hN@mail.gmail.com>
 <1284654451.2275.579.camel@laptop>
 <AANLkTinihPeUueKhEqUuraW2hcf3FFHjm26RieKQZi0d@mail.gmail.com>
 <1284657194.2275.585.camel@laptop>
 <AANLkTi=hFydeqk_ENGmqEqwqduSeN2gpjMr+VpcN38Xx@mail.gmail.com>
 <SNT125-W305F365835060339BD4008C37D0@phx.gbl>,<20100919214802.GA22579@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2010 22:47:14.0920 (UTC) FILETIME=[9ADE2680:01CB584C]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> > (Adding Russell King of ARM Linux to CC list)
>
> I'm not sure why you're repeatedly sending me this email (this is the
> second in less than 24 hours.)
Sorry, the first one was sent with multipart/alternate with both HTML
and plain text, leading it to be rejected by LKML.

> In any case, it's not like I can influence the direction ARM Ltd take
> their architecture - I only hear about stuff after the decisions have
> been taken and the direction set. (Sometimes I hear about stuff just
> before the public announcement.)
>
> So, if you think I can do anything to stop the move towards LPAS
> (large physical address space) and tell ARM to go to 64-bit directly,
> you're sadly mistaken.
If I know of email address of any ARM engineers, I'd add them to CC list too.

Yuhong Bao