From: Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
To: seanjc@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix NMI event loss
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:07:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SY4P282MB10841E53BAF421675FCE991D9DE0A@SY4P282MB1084.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
Hi, Sean:
I have found that in the latest version of the kernel, some PMU events are
being lost. I used bisect and found out the breaking commit [1], which
moved the handling of NMI events from `handle_exception_irqoff` to
`vmx_vcpu_enter_exit`.
If I revert this part as done in this patch, it works correctly. However,
I'm not really familiar with KVM, and I'm not sure about the intent behind
the original patch [1]. Could you please take a look on this? Thanks a lot.
My use case is to sample the IP of guest OS using `perf kvm`:
`perf kvm --guest record -a -g -e instructions -F 10000 -- sleep 1`
If it works correctly, it will record about 10000 samples (as `-F 10000`)
and it will say:
`[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.9 MB perf.data.guest (9729 samples) ]`
And if not, it will only record ~100 samples, sometimes no sample at all.
If it's useful for your debug, The callchain of `vmx_vcpu_enter_exit` is:
vmx_vcpu_enter_exit
vmx_vcpu_run
kvm_x86_vcpu_run
vcpu_enter_guest
While the callchain of `handle_exception_irqoff` is:
handle_exception_irqoff
vmx_handle_exit_irqoff
kvm_x86_handle_exit_irqoff
vcpu_enter_guest
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221213060912.654668-8-seanjc@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index df461f387e20..3a0b13867a6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6955,6 +6955,12 @@ static void handle_exception_irqoff(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
/* Handle machine checks before interrupts are enabled */
else if (is_machine_check(intr_info))
kvm_machine_check();
+ /* We need to handle NMIs before interrupts are enabled */
+ else if (is_nmi(intr_info)) {
+ kvm_before_interrupt(&vmx->vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI);
+ vmx_do_nmi_irqoff();
+ kvm_after_interrupt(&vmx->vcpu);
+ }
}
static void handle_external_interrupt_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -7251,13 +7257,6 @@ static noinstr void vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
else
vmx->exit_reason.full = vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_REASON);
- if ((u16)vmx->exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI &&
- is_nmi(vmx_get_intr_info(vcpu))) {
- kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI);
- vmx_do_nmi_irqoff();
- kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu);
- }
-
guest_state_exit_irqoff();
}
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-28 9:07 Tianyi Liu [this message]
2023-08-28 14:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-28 15:53 ` Tianyi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SY4P282MB10841E53BAF421675FCE991D9DE0A@SY4P282MB1084.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=i.pear@outlook.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®