From: Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf kvm: Support sampling guest callchains
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 22:57:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SY4P282MB108433024762F1F292D47C2A9DCFA@SY4P282MB1084.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SY4P282MB1084ECBCC1B176153B9E2A009DCFA@SY4P282MB1084.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
This patch provides support for sampling guests' callchains.
The signature of `get_perf_callchain` has been modified to explicitly
specify whether it needs to sample the host or guest callchain.
Based on the context, it will distribute the sampling request to one of
`perf_callchain_user`, `perf_callchain_kernel`, or `perf_callchain_guest`.
The reason for separately implementing `perf_callchain_user` and
`perf_callchain_kernel` is that the kernel may utilize special unwinders
such as `ORC`. However, for the guest, we only support stackframe-based
unwinding, so the implementation is generic and only needs to be
separately implemented for 32-bit and 64-bit.
Signed-off-by: Tianyi Liu <i.pear@outlook.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +-
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 8 +++---
kernel/events/callchain.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++-
kernel/events/core.c | 7 ++++-
5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 185f902e5..ea4c86175 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2758,11 +2758,6 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
struct unwind_state state;
unsigned long addr;
- if (perf_guest_state()) {
- /* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
- return;
- }
-
if (perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ip))
return;
@@ -2778,6 +2773,52 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
}
}
+static inline void
+perf_callchain_guest32(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry)
+{
+ struct stack_frame_ia32 frame;
+ const struct stack_frame_ia32 *fp;
+
+ fp = (void *)perf_guest_get_frame_pointer();
+ while (fp && entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
+ if (!perf_guest_read_virt(&fp->next_frame, &frame.next_frame,
+ sizeof(frame.next_frame)))
+ break;
+ if (!perf_guest_read_virt(&fp->return_address, &frame.return_address,
+ sizeof(frame.return_address)))
+ break;
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, frame.return_address);
+ fp = (void *)frame.next_frame;
+ }
+}
+
+void
+perf_callchain_guest(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry)
+{
+ struct stack_frame frame;
+ const struct stack_frame *fp;
+ unsigned int guest_state;
+
+ guest_state = perf_guest_state();
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, perf_guest_get_ip());
+
+ if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_64BIT) {
+ fp = (void *)perf_guest_get_frame_pointer();
+ while (fp && entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
+ if (!perf_guest_read_virt(&fp->next_frame, &frame.next_frame,
+ sizeof(frame.next_frame)))
+ break;
+ if (!perf_guest_read_virt(&fp->return_address, &frame.return_address,
+ sizeof(frame.return_address)))
+ break;
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, frame.return_address);
+ fp = (void *)frame.next_frame;
+ }
+ } else {
+ perf_callchain_guest32(entry);
+ }
+}
+
static inline int
valid_user_frame(const void __user *fp, unsigned long size)
{
@@ -2861,11 +2902,6 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs
struct stack_frame frame;
const struct stack_frame __user *fp;
- if (perf_guest_state()) {
- /* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
- return;
- }
-
/*
* We don't know what to do with VM86 stacks.. ignore them for now.
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d0f937a62..a2baf4856 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1545,9 +1545,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, perf_callchain_entry);
extern void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern void perf_callchain_guest(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry);
extern struct perf_callchain_entry *
get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool user,
- u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
+ bool host, bool guest, u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
extern int get_callchain_buffers(int max_stack);
extern void put_callchain_buffers(void);
extern struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 458bb80b1..2e88d4639 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
- trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
- false, false);
+ trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, true, false,
+ max_depth, false, false);
if (unlikely(!trace))
/* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
@@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
else if (kernel && task)
trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
else
- trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, max_depth,
- false, false);
+ trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, true, false,
+ max_depth, false, false);
if (unlikely(!trace))
goto err_fault;
diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 1273be843..7e80729e9 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ __weak void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
{
}
+__weak void perf_callchain_guest(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry)
+{
+}
+
static void release_callchain_buffers_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct callchain_cpus_entries *entries;
@@ -178,11 +182,12 @@ put_callchain_entry(int rctx)
struct perf_callchain_entry *
get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool user,
- u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
+ bool host, bool guest, u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
{
struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
int rctx;
+ unsigned int guest_state;
entry = get_callchain_entry(&rctx);
if (!entry)
@@ -194,6 +199,26 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool user,
ctx.contexts = 0;
ctx.contexts_maxed = false;
+ guest_state = perf_guest_state();
+ if (guest_state) {
+ if (!guest)
+ goto exit_put;
+ if (user && (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)) {
+ if (add_mark)
+ perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_GUEST_USER);
+ perf_callchain_guest(&ctx);
+ }
+ if (kernel && !(guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)) {
+ if (add_mark)
+ perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_GUEST_KERNEL);
+ perf_callchain_guest(&ctx);
+ }
+ goto exit_put;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(!host))
+ goto exit_put;
+
if (kernel && !user_mode(regs)) {
if (add_mark)
perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_KERNEL);
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index eaba00ec2..b3401f403 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7559,6 +7559,8 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
bool kernel = !event->attr.exclude_callchain_kernel;
bool user = !event->attr.exclude_callchain_user;
+ bool host = !event->attr.exclude_host;
+ bool guest = !event->attr.exclude_guest;
/* Disallow cross-task user callchains. */
bool crosstask = event->ctx->task && event->ctx->task != current;
const u32 max_stack = event->attr.sample_max_stack;
@@ -7567,7 +7569,10 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!kernel && !user)
return &__empty_callchain;
- callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user,
+ if (!host && !guest)
+ return &__empty_callchain;
+
+ callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, 0, kernel, user, host, guest,
max_stack, crosstask, true);
return callchain ?: &__empty_callchain;
}
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-08 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-08 14:48 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: KVM: Enable callchains for guests Tianyi Liu
2023-10-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: Add arch specific interfaces for sampling guest callchains Tianyi Liu
2023-10-08 21:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-08 21:32 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-08 22:25 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-09 3:17 ` Tianyi Liu
2023-10-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf kvm: Introduce guest interfaces for sampling callchains Tianyi Liu
2023-10-08 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: implement new perf interfaces Tianyi Liu
2023-10-08 14:57 ` Tianyi Liu [this message]
2023-10-08 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf kvm: Support sampling guest callchains kernel test robot
2023-10-10 16:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-11 14:44 ` Tianyi Liu
2023-10-12 20:41 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-08 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf tools: Support PERF_CONTEXT_GUEST_* flags Tianyi Liu
2023-10-11 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: KVM: Enable callchains for guests Marc Zyngier
2023-10-12 6:35 ` Tianyi Liu
2023-10-13 14:01 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-20 9:21 ` Tianyi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SY4P282MB108433024762F1F292D47C2A9DCFA@SY4P282MB1084.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=i.pear@outlook.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®