mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	Claudiu.Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>,
	"andi.shyti@kernel.org" <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"geert+renesas@glider.be" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"magnus.damm@gmail.com" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"sboyd@kernel.org" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com"
	<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:05:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TY3PR01MB11346128D4F85CF889A6C0ADE86D02@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY3PR01MB11346B97813661374F72A677986D02@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets
> 
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 12:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to
> > describe the register offsets
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28.06.2024 13:49, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Hi Claudiu,
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > >> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 11:25 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays
> > >> to describe the register offsets
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 28.06.2024 11:24, Biju Das wrote:
> > >>> Hi Claudiu,
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > >>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 9:13 AM
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays
> > >>>> to describe the register offsets
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 28.06.2024 11:09, Biju Das wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 9:03 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual
> > >>>>>> arrays to describe the register offsets
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 28.06.2024 10:55, Biju Das wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 8:32 AM
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual
> > >>>>>>>> arrays to describe the register offsets
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi, Biju,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 28.06.2024 08:59, Biju Das wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 1:14 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual
> > >>>>>>>>>> arrays to describe the register offsets
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets.
> > >>>>>>>>>> In this way we can describe different IP variants that
> > >>>>>>>>>> share the same register offsets but have differences in other characteristics.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Commit prepares for the addition
> > >>>>>>>> of fast mode plus.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
> > >>>>>>>>>> <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
> > >>>>>>>>>> - none
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c | 58
> > >>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c index
> > >>>>>>>>>> 9fe007609076..8ffbead95492 100644
> > >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ enum riic_reg_list {  };
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>  struct riic_of_data {
> > >>>>>>>>>> -	u8 regs[RIIC_REG_END];
> > >>>>>>>>>> +	const u8 *regs;
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Since you are touching this part, can we drop struct and Use
> > >>>>>>>>> u8* as device_data instead?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Patch 09/12 "i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus" adds
> > >>>>>>>> a new member to struct
> > >>>>>> riic_of_data.
> > >>>>>>>> That new member is needed to differentiate b/w hardware
> > >>>>>>>> versions supporting fast mode plus based on compatible.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Are we sure RZ/A does not support fast mode plus?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From commit description of patch 09/12:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Fast mode plus is available on most of the IP variants that
> > >>>>>> RIIC driver is working with. The exception is (according to HW
> > >>>>>> manuals of the SoCs where this IP is
> > >>>> available) the Renesas RZ/A1H.
> > >>>>>> For this, patch introduces the struct riic_of_data::fast_mode_plus.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I checked the manuals of all the SoCs where this driver is used.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I haven't checked the H/W manual?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On the manual I've downloaded from Renesas web site the FMPE
> > >>>>>> bit of RIICnFER is not available on RZ/A1H.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I just found RZ/A2M manual, it supports FMP and register layout looks similar to RZ/G2L.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I introduced struct riic_of_data::fast_mode_plus because of RZ/A1H.
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe make the register layout as per SoC
> > >>>
> > >>> RZ/A1 --> &riic_rz_a_info
> > >>> RZ/A2 and RZ/{G2L,G2LC,V2L,G2UL,FIVE} --> &riic_rz_g2_info RZ/G3S
> > >>> and RZ/V2H --> &riic_rz_v2h_info
> > >>
> > >> Sorry, but I don't understand. Patch 09/12 already does that but a
> > >> bit
> > >> differently:
> > >
> > > Now register layout is added to differentiate the SoCs for adding
> > > support to RZ/G3S and this layout should match with the hardware manual for all supported SoCs.
> > > Currently it is wrong for RZ/A2 SoC, while you fixed it for all other SoCs.
> >
> > I checked RZ/A2M. There is nothing broken. The only thing that I see
> > is that the FP+ is not enabled on RZ/A2M (please let me know if there
> > is anything else I missed). I don't see this broken. It is the same behavior that was before this
> patch.
> 
> As per RZ/A2M hardware manual, ICFER register is present
> 
> While as per [1], you don't have this register. So according to me RZ/A2 SoC register layout is
> broken and it is same as RZ/A1.
> 

Oops, ICFER register is present in RZ/A1 as well.

Currently same compatible used for RZ/A1 and RZ/A2
that needs to be updated in patch#9 as the later has
FMP capability like RZ/G2L.

Cheers,
Biju



  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-28 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25 12:13 [PATCH v2 00/12] i2c: riic: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S Claudiu
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] clk: renesas: r9a08g045: Add clock, reset and power domain support for I2C Claudiu
2024-06-26 12:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] i2c: riic: Use temporary variable for struct device Claudiu
2024-07-04 22:30   ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-08  5:13     ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] i2c: riic: Call pm_runtime_get_sync() when need to access registers Claudiu
2024-07-04 22:32   ` Andi Shyti
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] i2c: riic: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() Claudiu
2024-06-25 15:53   ` Biju Das
2024-06-26  6:13     ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-26  6:23       ` Biju Das
2024-06-26  6:30         ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-27 19:21           ` Andi Shyti
2024-06-26  7:10         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-26  8:15           ` Biju Das
2024-07-04 22:42   ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-05  7:19     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-05 12:14       ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-08  5:19       ` claudiu beznea
2024-07-08  5:36     ` Biju Das
2024-07-08  9:33       ` Biju Das
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] i2c: riic: Enable runtime PM autosuspend support Claudiu
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] i2c: riic: Add suspend/resume support Claudiu
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets Claudiu
2024-06-28  5:59   ` Biju Das
2024-06-28  7:32     ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28  7:55       ` Biju Das
2024-06-28  8:02         ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28  8:04           ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28  8:09           ` Biju Das
2024-06-28  8:12             ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28  8:24               ` Biju Das
2024-06-28  8:29                 ` Biju Das
2024-06-28 10:25                 ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28 10:49                   ` Biju Das
2024-06-28 11:24                     ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28 11:29                       ` Biju Das
2024-06-28 15:05                         ` Biju Das [this message]
2024-06-28  9:13               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-28 10:28                 ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-28 11:39                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-29 11:11                     ` claudiu beznea
2024-08-19 19:56                     ` Andi Shyti
2024-06-28  9:08             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-28  9:13               ` Biju Das
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the R9A08G045 support Claudiu
2024-06-25 16:28   ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus Claudiu
2024-06-28  9:22   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-28 10:06     ` claudiu beznea
2024-07-10 14:20     ` claudiu beznea
2024-07-11  7:53       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-11 10:55         ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-29  5:38   ` Biju Das
2024-06-29 11:13     ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g045: Add I2C nodes Claudiu
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc: Enable i2c0 node Claudiu
2024-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc-som: Enable i2c1 node Claudiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TY3PR01MB11346128D4F85CF889A6C0ADE86D02@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=Chris.Brandt@renesas.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®