From: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>
To: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Change vmid alloc strategy from bitmap to ida
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 00:16:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYCP286MB2323E0C525FF9F94E3B07C7ACA35A@TYCP286MB2323.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
For current implementation of vmid allocation of arm smmu-v3, a per-smmu
devide bitmap of 64K bits(8K bytes) is allocated on behalf of possible VMID
range, which is two pages for some architectures. Besides that, its memory
consumption is 'static', despite of how many VMIDs are allocated actually.
That's memory inefficient and lack of scalability.
So an IDA based implementation is introduced to address this issue, which
is capable of self-expanding on the actual need of VMID allocation.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29 +++++----------------
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 9b0dc3505601..d9487602701f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2055,24 +2055,6 @@ static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
return &smmu_domain->domain;
}
-static int arm_smmu_bitmap_alloc(unsigned long *map, int span)
-{
- int idx, size = 1 << span;
-
- do {
- idx = find_first_zero_bit(map, size);
- if (idx == size)
- return -ENOSPC;
- } while (test_and_set_bit(idx, map));
-
- return idx;
-}
-
-static void arm_smmu_bitmap_free(unsigned long *map, int idx)
-{
- clear_bit(idx, map);
-}
-
static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
@@ -2093,7 +2075,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
} else {
struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
if (cfg->vmid)
- arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->vmid_map, cfg->vmid);
+ ida_free(&smmu->vmid_map, cfg->vmid);
}
kfree(smmu_domain);
@@ -2167,7 +2149,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise_s2(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
typeof(&pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s2_cfg.vtcr) vtcr;
- vmid = arm_smmu_bitmap_alloc(smmu->vmid_map, smmu->vmid_bits);
+ /* Reserve VMID 0 for stage-2 bypass STEs */
+ vmid = ida_alloc_range(&smmu->vmid_map, 1, (1 << smmu->vmid_bits) - 1,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (vmid < 0)
return vmid;
@@ -3098,8 +3082,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
reg |= STRTAB_BASE_RA;
smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab_base = reg;
- /* Allocate the first VMID for stage-2 bypass STEs */
- set_bit(0, smmu->vmid_map);
+ ida_init(&smmu->vmid_map);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -3923,6 +3907,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
iommu_device_sysfs_remove(&smmu->iommu);
arm_smmu_device_disable(smmu);
iopf_queue_free(smmu->evtq.iopf);
+ ida_destroy(&smmu->vmid_map);
}
static void arm_smmu_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index dcab85698a4e..9915850dd4db 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
#define ARM_SMMU_MAX_VMIDS (1 << 16)
unsigned int vmid_bits;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(vmid_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_VMIDS);
+ struct ida vmid_map;
unsigned int ssid_bits;
unsigned int sid_bits;
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-15 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-15 16:16 Dawei Li [this message]
2023-07-25 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-01 20:41 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TYCP286MB2323E0C525FF9F94E3B07C7ACA35A@TYCP286MB2323.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=set_pte_at@outlook.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®