From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262918AbREWAVc>; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:21:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262919AbREWAVW>; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:21:22 -0400
Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:32963 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262918AbREWAVH>;
	Tue, 22 May 2001 20:21:07 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 02:20:31 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Message-Id: <UTC200105230020.CAA79506.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, viro@math.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@transmeta.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> why not implement partitions as simply doing block remaps

Everybody agrees.

Andries