From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262920AbREWAXw>; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:23:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262922AbREWAXm>; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:23:42 -0400
Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:47043 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262920AbREWAXZ>;
	Tue, 22 May 2001 20:23:25 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 02:22:50 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Message-Id: <UTC200105230022.CAA78531.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
To: dalecki@evision-ventures.com, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@transmeta.com, viro@math.psu.edu
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> IMHO it would be nice to create wrappers for accessing the block arrays

Last year Linus didnt like that at all. Maybe this year.

Andries