From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263202AbREWS3H>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:29:07 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263204AbREWS2r>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:28:47 -0400
Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:56244 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S263202AbREWS2i>;
	Wed, 23 May 2001 14:28:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 20:28:03 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Message-Id: <UTC200105231828.UAA89871.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, viro@math.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device
Cc: helgehaf@idb.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Andries, initrd code is _sick_.

Oh, but the fact that there exists a bad implementation
does not mean the idea is wrong. It is really easy to
make an elegant implementation.

Andries