From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.post@eds.com
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: kernel mount of initrd fails unless mke2fs uses 1024 byt e blocks
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:55:50 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <UTC200204121755.RAA597903.aeb@cwi.nl> (raw)
From: "Post, Mark K" <mark.post@eds.com>
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Trying to use an initrd for an installation fails unless the mke2fs
used a blocksize of 1024 bytes.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I'm trying to create a Linux for S/390 version 2.2.20 installation
kernel/ramdisk set. When I create the ramdisk, if I issue the mke2fs
command with -b 2048 or -b 4096, it works fine. But, I try to boot the
system, I get an "EXT2-fs: Magic mismatch, very weird !" error when the
kernel tries to mount the ramdisk as the root file system. If I let the
blocksize default, or specify -b 1024, everything works fine.
The comparison that seems to be failing is at line 500 of
linux/fs/ext/super.c:
if (es->s_magic != le16_to_cpu(EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC)) {
printk ("EXT2-fs: Magic mismatch, very weird !\n");
goto failed_mount;
Well, we can read the source.
ext2_read_super() starts finding a blocksize:
blocksize = get_hardblocksize(dev);
and buffer.c:get_hardblocksize() returns hardsect_size[major][minor].
rd.c sets hardsect_size[] to rd_hardsec, and initializes rd_hardsec
to RDBLK_SIZE, which is 512.
OK, so blocksize = 512.
Next,
if (blocksize < BLOCK_SIZE)
blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE;
So, now it is 1024.
Then bread (dev, 1, blocksize) reads the wrong part,
if in reality blocksize was different.
I once submitted a patch for this, but apparently it is not in 2.2.20.
Might do so later this evening, if there is time.
Andries
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-12 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-12 17:55 Andries.Brouwer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-12 21:17 Andries.Brouwer
2002-04-12 21:01 Post, Mark K
2002-04-12 20:40 Andries.Brouwer
2002-04-12 14:52 Post, Mark K
2002-04-09 20:47 Post, Mark K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=UTC200204121755.RAA597903.aeb@cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.post@eds.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®