mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, jamie@shareable.org
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mbligh@aracnet.com, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill ide-geometry.c, fix boot problems
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:00:05 +0200 (MEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <UTC200304162300.h3GN05X17159.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> (raw)

    From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>

    Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
    > Now the RedHat installer can do the remap in case it detects
    > a disk manager. That is nice, because that means that in case of
    > a whole-disk install it could ask the user whether she wants to
    > preserve this animal. Probably she doesnt.

    That is quite nice - ask user at install time whether to remove the
    disk manager.

    However, after doing that it seems appropriate for a booting kernel to
    autodetect the presence or absence of the disk manager and behave
    accordingly.

Once the redhat installer has determined that there really
is a disk manager, and that the user wants it that way, it can
add the boot parameter hda=remap63.

I dislike autodetection. The word sounds so nice. But a synonym
is guessing.

If kernel guessing is required it means that some interface is missing.
Policy should be determined from userspace.

But of course, it is easy to add some heuristic code.
I would prefer to keep such code out of the vanilla kernel,
but a vendor might want it.

[And note that todays patch did not remove any DM detection.
This discussion is 37 patch levels late.]


Andries

             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-16 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-16 23:00 Andries.Brouwer [this message]
2003-04-17 13:19 ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-17  7:22 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-17  0:29 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-16 18:02 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-16 20:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-16 15:16 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-16 15:28 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=UTC200304162300.h3GN05X17159.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl \
    --to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®