From: <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: hackbench?
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:07:18 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <UTC200409181807.i8II7IK06013.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> (raw)
On http://developer.osdl.org/craiger/hackbench one finds hackbench.c
and the result that 2.6 is much better than 2.4 where scheduling is
concerned.
I was shown results that go in the other direction, so just tried
on a machine here.
50 processes
2.4.26: 24 sec
2.6.0t11: 72 sec
2.6.8.1: 120 sec
20 processes
2.4.26: 8.6 sec
2.6.0t11: 29 sec
2.6.8.1: 30 sec
This was on a 256 MB 400 MHz Pentium II.
Andries
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-18 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 18:07 Andries.Brouwer [this message]
2004-09-18 18:56 ` hackbench? Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=UTC200409181807.i8II7IK06013.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®