From: Nicholas Knight <nknight@pocketinet.com>
To: "Gérard Roudier" <groudier@free.fr>,
Linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bounce from andre@linuxdiskcert.org
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 06:59:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <WHITEvJ1xKjtgZe0J64000008b1@white.pocketinet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011230122500.E859-100000@gerard>
In-Reply-To: <20011230122500.E859-100000@gerard>
On Sunday 30 December 2001 03:33 am, Gérard Roudier wrote:
> Hello Andre,
>
> I already said you that my replies get not accepted by your email
> agents.
>
> If you want to post to an open list then you want to accept messages
> from people subscribed to that list. Doing different is just
> impoliteness.
Andre isn't the only one that does this. It seems many people enjoy
blocking people with access to only one smtp server. Esspecialy when
that server is on a very small, isolated ISP, or an ISP that people
just ASSUME is up to bad things.
David Weinehall sent me a private email recently, to which I responded,
but didn't go through because, oh wonder of wonders, the pocketinet
smtp server is listed on A spam list, and an apparent alias,
white.pocketinet.com, is on two.
Now, aren't all these spam lists supposed to try and CONTACT the
providers to get the issue resolved before blacklisting them? I know
for a fact that if someone had actually contacted pocketinet about the
problem customer that sent spam, they would have taken care of it
promptly. It's a very small ISP in a remote area of Washington State,
and it's run by friendly and competent people.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-30 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3C2BE2010004B5F3@mail.libertysurf.net>
2001-12-30 11:33 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-12-30 14:26 ` Lionel Bouton
2001-12-30 14:59 ` Nicholas Knight [this message]
2001-12-30 17:05 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-12-30 19:11 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-12-31 9:38 ` brian
2001-12-31 15:38 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-12-31 16:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-01 1:58 ` brian
2002-01-01 16:47 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-04 0:52 ` Petro
2002-01-08 17:12 ` David Weinehall
2002-01-08 17:36 ` Nick LeRoy
2002-01-08 18:35 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-08 18:51 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=WHITEvJ1xKjtgZe0J64000008b1@white.pocketinet.com \
--to=nknight@pocketinet.com \
--cc=groudier@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®