From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266141AbUHODFd (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:05:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266334AbUHODFc (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:05:32 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:54984 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266141AbUHODF2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:05:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 04:04:09 +0200 From: "xerces8" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: New versioning scheme ? ( 2.6.8.1 ) Message-ID: X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.8.5 X-Authenticated-Sender: xerces8@butn.net X-Spam-Processed: butn.net, Sun, 15 Aug 2004 04:04:09 +0200 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: xerces8@butn.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! Can someone tell me why the ages old, established versioning scheme of x.y.z was "abolished" and x.y.z.w was introduced ? Regards, David Balazic