mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Avoid potential multiplication overflow on 32-bit
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:37:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/0nmQ/XBpj6PJAh@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111125702.360745-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:57:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As nwl_dsi.lanes is u32, and NSEC_PER_SEC is 1000000000L, the second
> multiplication in
> 
>     dsi->lanes * 8 * NSEC_PER_SEC
> 
> will overflow on a 32-bit platform.  Fix this by making the constant
> unsigned long long, forcing 64-bit arithmetic.
> 
> While iMX8 is arm64, this driver is currently used on 64-bit platforms
> only, where long is 64-bit, so this cannot happen.  But the issue may
> start to happen when the driver is reused for a 32-bit SoC, or when code
> is copied for a new driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> Compile-tested only.
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> index 66b67402f1acd57d..a8da3081efdcc84e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static u32 ps2bc(struct nwl_dsi *dsi, unsigned long long ps)
>  	u32 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(dsi->format);
>  
>  	return DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(ps * dsi->mode.clock * bpp,
> -				  dsi->lanes * 8 * NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +				  dsi->lanes * 8ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC);

I wonder if we could get rid of a whole class of bugs by turning
NSEC_PER_SEC into a ULL, but I suppose there are valid cases where a
32-bit integer is enough.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

How did you come across this by the way ?

>  }
>  
>  /*

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 12:57 Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-11 18:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-01-12  4:37 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2021-01-12  8:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X/0nmQ/XBpj6PJAh@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®