From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/x86: Only expose userspace rdpmc for events on current CPU
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:32:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/3BDlQxTCYd2HJs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108000136.1556129-1-robh@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:01:36PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> Userspace access using rdpmc only makes sense if the event is valid for
> the current CPU. However, cap_user_rdpmc is currently set no matter which
> CPU the event is associated with. The result is userspace reading another
> CPU's event thinks it can use rdpmc to read the counter. In doing so, the
> wrong counter will be read.
Don't do that then?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index a88c94d65693..6e6d4c1d03ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -2490,7 +2490,8 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
> userpg->cap_user_time = 0;
> userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
> userpg->cap_user_rdpmc =
> - !!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED);
> + !!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED) &&
> + (event->oncpu == smp_processor_id());
> userpg->pmc_width = x86_pmu.cntval_bits;
>
> if (!using_native_sched_clock() || !sched_clock_stable())
Isn't that a nop? That is, from the few sites I checked, we're always
calling this on the event's CPU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 0:01 Rob Herring
2021-01-12 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-01-12 16:16 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-12 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-12 20:09 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/3BDlQxTCYd2HJs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®