From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Cc: Roy Im <roy.im.opensource@diasemi.com>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: da7280 - protect OF match table with CONFIG_OF
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:58:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/J2Ud24zs7ZJdTU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201220020109.GA13501@labundy.com>
Hi Jeff,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 08:01:09PM -0600, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:49:48PM +0000, Roy Im wrote:
> > On Friday, December 18, 2020 3:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > > The OF match table is only used when OF is enabled.
> > >
> > > Fixes: cd3f609823a5 ("Input: new da7280 haptic driver")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/input/misc/da7280.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c index 2f698a8c1d65..b08610d6e575 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c
> > > @@ -1300,11 +1300,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused da7280_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > return retval;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > static const struct of_device_id da7280_of_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "dlg,da7280", },
> > > { }
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, da7280_of_match);
> > > +#endif
>
> Just for my own understanding, would it not work just as well
> to include of_device.h? This includes mod_devicetable.h which
> in turn defines the of_device_id struct (even if CONFIG_OF is
> not set).
The issue here is not that the structure is undefined, but the variable
is unused. We could also fix this by not using of_match_ptr() when
assigning the match table to the driver structure, making the variable
referenced even if CONFIG_OF is off.
>
> The reason for asking is because it seems many drivers do not
> include these guards.
It could be that they are either only compiled with OF, or they decided
it is not worth saving a few bytes, or maybe they are used on ACPI-based
systems with PRP0001 bindings in which case the match table in the
driver might still be needed.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-18 6:50 Dmitry Torokhov
2020-12-18 16:49 ` Roy Im
2020-12-20 2:01 ` Jeff LaBundy
2021-01-04 1:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2021-01-04 4:03 ` Jeff LaBundy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/J2Ud24zs7ZJdTU@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@labundy.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy.im.opensource@diasemi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome