From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Add support for kernel debugger
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:20:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/cm1+wVQpoXj5Xr@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <036c09732183a30eaab230884114f65ca42ca3b9.1609865007.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:02:02PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Implement 'poll_put_char' and 'poll_get_char' callbacks in struct
> 'owl_uart_ops' that enables OWL UART to be used for kernel debugging
> over serial line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Reverted unnecessary changes per Andreas feedback
> - Optimized implementation for 'owl_uart_poll_get_char()'
> and 'owl_uart_poll_put_char()' callbacks
>
> drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> index c149f8c30007..54b24669ebc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/console.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -461,6 +462,26 @@ static void owl_uart_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL
> +
> +static int owl_uart_poll_get_char(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + if (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_RFEM)
> + return NO_POLL_CHAR;
> +
> + return owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_RXDAT);
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_uart_poll_put_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char ch)
> +{
> + while (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_TFFU)
> + cpu_relax();
Unbounded loops? What could possibly go wrong?
:(
Please don't do that in the kernel, put a max bound on this.
And are you _SURE_ that cpu_relax() is what you want to call here?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 17:02 Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-01-07 15:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-01-07 18:16 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-01-08 7:58 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-01-08 14:10 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/cm1+wVQpoXj5Xr@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®