mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Cc: rja_direct@groups.int.hpe.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: With > 8 nodes, get pci bus die id from NUMA info
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:00:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/xL8d8FXVJHkQUj@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108153549.108989-3-steve.wahl@hpe.com>

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 09:35:49AM -0600, Steve Wahl wrote:


> +		/*
> +		 * The nodeid and idmap registers only contain enough
> +		 * information to handle 8 nodes.  On systems with more
> +		 * than 8 nodes, we need to rely on NUMA information,
> +		 * filled in from BIOS supplied information, to determine
> +		 * the topology.
> +		 */

Egads.. do we realy have to trust BIOS data? BIOS crud tends to be
bonghits qualitee :/

> +		if (nr_node_ids <= 8) {
> +			/* get the Node ID of the local register */
> +			err = pci_read_config_dword(ubox_dev, nodeid_loc, &config);
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
> +			nodeid = config & NODE_ID_MASK;
> +			/* get the Node ID mapping */
> +			err = pci_read_config_dword(ubox_dev, idmap_loc, &config);
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
>  
> +			segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
> +			raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +			map = __find_pci2phy_map(segment);
> +			if (!map) {
> +				raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +				err = -ENOMEM;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register maps
> +			 * to a particular node.
> +			 */
> +			for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> +				if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
> +					if (topology_max_die_per_package() > 1)
> +						die_id = i;
> +					else
> +						die_id = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(i);
> +					map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
>  			raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +		} else {
> +			int node = pcibus_to_node(ubox_dev->bus);
> +			int cpu;
> +
> +			segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
> +			raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +			map = __find_pci2phy_map(segment);
> +			if (!map) {
> +				raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +				err = -ENOMEM;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			die_id = -1;
> +			for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_pcibus(ubox_dev->bus)) {
> +				struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> +
> +				if (c->initialized && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node) {
> +					map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id = c->logical_die_id;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +			raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +
> +			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1)) {
> +				err = -EINVAL;
>  				break;
>  			}

This seems to assume a single die per node; is that fundemantally
correct?

Did you consider malicious BIOS data? I think we're good, but I didn't
look too hard.

>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!err) {
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08 15:35 [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Derive die id from NUMA info with more than 8 nodes Steve Wahl
2021-01-08 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Store the logical die id instead of the physical die id Steve Wahl
2021-01-14 11:29   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Steve Wahl
2021-01-08 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: With > 8 nodes, get pci bus die id from NUMA info Steve Wahl
2021-01-11 13:00   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-01-11 15:45     ` Steve Wahl
2021-01-12 15:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-12 19:42         ` Steve Wahl
2021-01-14 11:29   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Steve Wahl
2021-01-11 16:39 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Derive die id from NUMA info with more than 8 nodes Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X/xL8d8FXVJHkQUj@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=rja_direct@groups.int.hpe.com \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®