mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Hinzmann <f.hinzmann@hamburg.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jan-Hinnerk Reichert <jan-hinnerk_reichert@hamburg.de>
Cc: Jan-Hinnerk Reichert <jan-hinnerk_reichert@hamburg.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Subject: Re: DMA problems w/ PIIX3 IDE, 2.4.20-pre4-ac2
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:29:58 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20020916172958.f.hinzmann@hamburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1032187595.1285.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

Hello Alan!


On 16-Sep-2002 Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 15:26, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
>> 
>> On 16-Sep-2002 Alan Cox wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 12:17, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
>> >> kernel: hdb: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
>> >> kernel: hdb: read_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=97567071, high=5, lo
>> >> kernel: hdb: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
>> > 
>> > Which is the drive reporting a physical media error
>> 
>> Which seems to exist only while using the named combinations of DMA access
>> and kernel versions. While using i.e. 2.4.19 without DMA I can access the same data,
>> dd the whole disk to /dev/null or run badblock checks without finding
>> any physical media errors.
>> 
>> 2.4.19 should complain, too, if there is a physical error indeed, right?
> 
> The "sectoridnotfound" return is from the drive. That makes it very hard
> to believe it isnt a physical error

This is what makes me believe it:

- I get "SectorIdNotFound" with differing sector numbers at three physical hard disk drives.
  At least two of this drives are not very old. One of them was bought only a few weeks
  ago.
- I had several occasions where I got this error while copying one given file. After rebooting
  (the same kernel with the same settings) accessing the same file was fine. 
- I can reproduce this errors starting to copy random groups of files from that disks
  within one or two minutes. That makes me think it is not one special area at the disk(s).
  On the other hand I can start several copy commands at once using the same commands
  as before without getting any errors with i.e. 2.4.19 without DMA. It is running then
  running stable for a long time (I think I tried times up to one hour).


My BIOS doesn't like disks larger than 32GB. Therefore the three disks are jumpered to
appear as 32GB (Maxtor disks) and I am using setmax resp. CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE to 
unclip them. 
Maybe this setup has something to do with the possibly bogus SectorIdNotFound message?


I am eager to sort this out. I would like to do the following:

- First, prove the drives don't have physical media errors. Is running "e2fsck -c" 
  sufficient? Do you have other suggestions to stress test my drives?

- Second, try hard to exclude other possible reasons for my drive returning that
  message. 
  While digging the archives I found one mail stating an old/broken/weak power supply
  caused that messages and a new one made them go away. I have already built in 
  a stronger and newer power supply - it did not change anything. 
  I changed nearly every part of that box in the past. Any ideas what else might 
  produce this errors? Too much heat? Cabling?

- Third, take a look at the software again. Is there anything I could try to help
  debugging this, i.e. trying every -ac release since 2.4.19 and find out which
  version is the first with this errors?


I would highly appreciate some guidance as I am trying to solve this for
months now and I am somehow aimless at this point.


  Regards
      Florian


--
  Florian Hinzmann                         private: f.hinzmann@hamburg.de
                                            Debian: fh@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F  DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-16 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-14 14:35 Jan-Hinnerk Reichert
2002-09-14 22:40 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-16 11:17   ` Florian Hinzmann
2002-09-16 12:33     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-16 14:26       ` Florian Hinzmann
2002-09-16 14:46         ` Alan Cox
2002-09-16 15:29           ` Florian Hinzmann [this message]
2002-09-16 16:13           ` Jan-Hinnerk Reichert
2002-09-16 16:19           ` Daniela Engert
2003-04-22  8:16           ` problem solved - late answer.. (was: Re: DMA problems w/ PIIX3 IDE, 2.4.20-pre4-ac2) Florian Hinzmann
2002-09-16 15:32         ` DMA problems w/ PIIX3 IDE, 2.4.20-pre4-ac2 Russell King
2002-09-16  8:58 ` Florian Hinzmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-04  9:47 Florian Hinzmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.20020916172958.f.hinzmann@hamburg.de \
    --to=f.hinzmann@hamburg.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jan-hinnerk_reichert@hamburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®