From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Chad Sellers <csellers@tresys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] SELinux: remove current object class and permission validation mechanism
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:02:07 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611131201230.6437@d.namei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611131158490.6437@d.namei>
Removes the current SELinux object class and permission validation code,
as the current code makes it impossible to change or remove object classes
and permissions on a running system. Additionally, the current code does
not actually validate that the classes and permissions are correct, but
instead merely validates that they do not change between policy reloads.
Signed-off-by: Chad Sellers <csellers@tresys.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
---
security/selinux/ss/services.c | 91 ----------------------------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
index bfe1227..33ae102 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
@@ -1018,89 +1018,6 @@ int security_change_sid(u32 ssid,
return security_compute_sid(ssid, tsid, tclass, AVTAB_CHANGE, out_sid);
}
-/*
- * Verify that each permission that is defined under the
- * existing policy is still defined with the same value
- * in the new policy.
- */
-static int validate_perm(void *key, void *datum, void *p)
-{
- struct hashtab *h;
- struct perm_datum *perdatum, *perdatum2;
- int rc = 0;
-
-
- h = p;
- perdatum = datum;
-
- perdatum2 = hashtab_search(h, key);
- if (!perdatum2) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: permission %s disappeared",
- (char *)key);
- rc = -ENOENT;
- goto out;
- }
- if (perdatum->value != perdatum2->value) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: the value of permission %s changed",
- (char *)key);
- rc = -EINVAL;
- }
-out:
- return rc;
-}
-
-/*
- * Verify that each class that is defined under the
- * existing policy is still defined with the same
- * attributes in the new policy.
- */
-static int validate_class(void *key, void *datum, void *p)
-{
- struct policydb *newp;
- struct class_datum *cladatum, *cladatum2;
- int rc;
-
- newp = p;
- cladatum = datum;
-
- cladatum2 = hashtab_search(newp->p_classes.table, key);
- if (!cladatum2) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: class %s disappeared\n",
- (char *)key);
- rc = -ENOENT;
- goto out;
- }
- if (cladatum->value != cladatum2->value) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: the value of class %s changed\n",
- (char *)key);
- rc = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
- if ((cladatum->comdatum && !cladatum2->comdatum) ||
- (!cladatum->comdatum && cladatum2->comdatum)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: the inherits clause for the access "
- "vector definition for class %s changed\n", (char *)key);
- rc = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
- if (cladatum->comdatum) {
- rc = hashtab_map(cladatum->comdatum->permissions.table, validate_perm,
- cladatum2->comdatum->permissions.table);
- if (rc) {
- printk(" in the access vector definition for class "
- "%s\n", (char *)key);
- goto out;
- }
- }
- rc = hashtab_map(cladatum->permissions.table, validate_perm,
- cladatum2->permissions.table);
- if (rc)
- printk(" in access vector definition for class %s\n",
- (char *)key);
-out:
- return rc;
-}
-
/* Clone the SID into the new SID table. */
static int clone_sid(u32 sid,
struct context *context,
@@ -1265,14 +1182,6 @@ #endif
sidtab_init(&newsidtab);
- /* Verify that the existing classes did not change. */
- if (hashtab_map(policydb.p_classes.table, validate_class, &newpolicydb)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "security: the definition of an existing "
- "class changed\n");
- rc = -EINVAL;
- goto err;
- }
-
/* Clone the SID table. */
sidtab_shutdown(&sidtab);
if (sidtab_map(&sidtab, clone_sid, &newsidtab)) {
--
1.4.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 17:01 [PATCH 0/4] SELinux updates for 2.6.20 James Morris
2006-11-13 17:02 ` James Morris [this message]
2006-11-13 17:02 ` Subject: [PATCH 2/4] SELinux: export object class and permission definitions James Morris
2006-11-13 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] SELinux: ensure keys constant in hashtab_search James Morris
2006-11-13 17:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] SELinux: validate kernel object classes and permissions James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611131201230.6437@d.namei \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=csellers@tresys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®