mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>,
	Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>,
	Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] selftests/proc: Remove idle time monotonicity assertions
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:48:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/YrWZ6GnwLcWlwW@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k00covg2.ffs@tglx>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:53:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20 2023 at 13:41, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > Due to broken iowait task counting design (cf: comments above
> > get_cpu_idle_time_us() and nr_iowait()), it is not possible to provide
> > the guarantee that /proc/stat or /proc/uptime display monotonic idle
> > time values.
> >
> > Remove the selftests that verify the related wrong assumption so that
> > testers and maintainers don't spend more time on that.
> >
> > Reported-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
> > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> I did really not ask you to remove the selftests alltogether.
> 
> Those tests check uptime and idle time. I asked you to remove the idle
> time monotonicity assertion.
> 
> uptime is really supposed to be monotonically increasing. It's based on
> CLOCK_BOOTTIME. If that goes backwards then we surely have more trouble
> than /proc/uptime.

Right, I naively thought it wasn't worth checking CLOCK_BOOTTIME monotonicity
alone... Anyway, kept that in the new version.

> 
> But it would be a good thing to change the test in the following way:
> 
>        ut1 = parse("/proc/uptime");
>        bt1 = clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME);
>        assert(ut1 <= bt1);
>        ut2 = parse("/proc/uptime");
>        bt2 = clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME);
>        assert(ut2 <= bt2);
>        assert(ut1 <= ut2);
>        ....
> 
> Hmm?

Makes sense, added to the new version.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-20 12:41 [PATCH 0/7] timers/nohz: Fixes and cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] timers/nohz: Restructure and reshuffle struct tick_sched Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] timers/nohz: Only ever update sleeptime from idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] timers/nohz: Protect idle/iowait sleep time under seqcount Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] timers/nohz: Add a comment about broken iowait counter update race Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] timers/nohz: Remove middle-function __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] MAINTAINERS: Remove stale email address Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 12:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests/proc: Remove idle time monotonicity assertions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-20 20:16   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2023-02-20 21:53   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-22 14:48     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/YrWZ6GnwLcWlwW@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=liaoyu15@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®