mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: On QCard, regulator L3C should be 1.8V
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:12:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+KUq8zc/kmtovVJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206184744.1.I784f4b3d7e4a06edafff4a3129f52e749889bc05@changeid>

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:48:10PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> On the first sc7280 QCards the L3C rail was never really used for
> anything. Stuffing options on the QCard meant that the QCard itself
> didn't use this rail for anything. This rail did get sent to the
> mainboard, but no existing mainboards ever did anything with it other
> that route it to a testpoint.

nit: s/that/than/

no need to re-spin just for that

> On later sc7280 QCards, the L3C rail was repurposed. Instead of being
> a (nominally) 3.3V rail, it was decided to make it a 1.8V rail. It is
> now provided to the display connector (which might route it to the
> touchscreen) and also used to power some buffers relating to
> touchscreen IO. This rail is getting the additional tag "ts_avccio",
> though some places still refer to it as "vreg_l3c_3p0" despite the
> fact that the name now specifies the wrong voltage.
> 
> Since it never hurts for this rail to be 1.8V (even on old QCards /
> old boards), let's just change it to 1.8V across the board and add the
> extra "ts_avccio" moniker as a label in the device tree.
> 
> Future patches will start using this rail in their touchscreens.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07  2:48 [PATCH 0/7] arm: qcom: Fix touchscreen voltage for sc7280-herobrine boards Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: On QCard, regulator L3C should be 1.8V Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07 18:12   ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add 3ms ramp to herobrine's pp3300_left_in_mlb Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07 18:15   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Hook up the touchscreen IO rail on villager Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07 18:18   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] HID: i2c-hid: goodix: Stop tying the reset line to the regulator Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07  3:58   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-07 18:31   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] dt-bindings: HID: i2c-hid: goodix: Add mainboard-vddio-supply Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07  4:01   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-07 21:19   ` Rob Herring
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] " Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07  4:02   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-07 18:46   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-07  2:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Hook up the touchscreen IO rail on evoker Douglas Anderson
2023-02-07 18:47   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-09  4:22 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/7] arm: qcom: Fix touchscreen voltage for sc7280-herobrine boards Bjorn Andersson
2023-02-09 13:50 ` Benjamin Tissoires

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+KUq8zc/kmtovVJ@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=steve@sk2.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®