From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0/hqbzrqZk89149@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018233148.lgoiis2tws7caw3l@treble>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:31:48PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Is there a reason not to default to FineIBT if the hardware supports it?
Not really; and that's the default implemented here. Kees seems to think
the kCFI thing is a little more resillient against attacks where the
attacker can write code -- but IMO that's a bit of a lost cause.
Being able to run kCFI on IBT hardware is useful for
development/debugging purposes though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 13:35 Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 14:43 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 15:58 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 17:20 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:33 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 21:27 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19 5:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-10-19 5:14 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 21:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 5:05 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 15:22 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-20 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 19:59 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:32 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 19:35 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 5:00 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 20:17 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 4:48 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-31 19:13 ` Joao Moreira
2022-11-01 21:39 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 21:50 ` Joao Moreira
2024-05-06 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-07 1:45 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:18 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 5:16 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-20 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19 7:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-21 23:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-22 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-24 17:15 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-24 18:38 ` Joao Moreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0/hqbzrqZk89149@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®