From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
<linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs: use kmap_local_page() only for erofs_bread()
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:51:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y09mS6LrHCGmi+AJ@iweiny-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y084l0m88JGOqGRN@B-P7TQMD6M-0146.lan>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 07:36:55AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:21:27AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 11:29:21 PM CEST Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> ...
[snip]
> >
> > In Btrfs I solved (thanks to David S.' advice) by mapping only one of two
> > pages, only the one coming from the page cache.
> >
> > The other page didn't need the use of kmap_local_page() because it was
> > allocated in the filesystem with "alloc_page(GFP_NOFS)". GFP_NOFS won't ever
> > allocate from ZONE_HIGHMEM, therefore a direct page_address() could avoid the
> > mapping and the nesting issues.
> >
> > Did you check if you may solve the same way?
>
> That is not simple. Currently we have compressed pages and decompressed
> pages (page cache or others), and they can be unmapped when either data
> is all consumed, so compressed pages can be unmapped first, or
> decompressed pages can be unmapped first. That quite depends on which
> pages goes first.
>
> I think such usage is a quite common pattern for decoder or encoder,
> you could take a look at z_erofs_lzma_decompress() in
> fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c. So kmap() is still useful for such cases
> since I don't really care the HIGHMEM performance but correctness, but
> other alternative could churn/complex the map/unmap/remap pattern.
>
When you say kmap() is still useful is this because of the map/unmap ordering
restrictions or because the address is required in different threads?
Ira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 10:53 Gao Xiang
2022-10-18 16:28 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-18 19:18 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-18 21:29 ` Gao Xiang
2022-10-18 23:21 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-18 23:36 ` Gao Xiang
2022-10-19 2:51 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2022-10-19 3:06 ` Gao Xiang
2022-10-19 18:17 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-10-20 2:18 ` Gao Xiang
2022-10-20 3:17 ` Ira Weiny
2022-10-20 3:50 ` Gao Xiang
2022-12-01 10:09 ` Jingbo Xu
2022-12-07 1:16 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y09mS6LrHCGmi+AJ@iweiny-desk3 \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®