Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move from git://github.com to https://github.com

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:32:58AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > Github deprecated the git:// links about a year ago, but it looks like
> > there's still a handful of them in the MAINTAINERS file.  Conor pointed
> > this out about the RISC-V KVM tree, but I figured it'd be better to just
> > fix them all -- I've got a bunch of insteadOf so I didn't even notice
> > the deprecation, but new contributors probably don't and might get a bit
> > confused.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> > Link: https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/
> > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > @@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ M:	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> >  M:	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> >  R:	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
> >  S:	Maintained
> > -T:	git git://github.com/broadcom/mach-bcm
> > +T:	git https://github.com/broadcom/mach-bcm
> 
> This link is dead, I can't find a repo with that name on their GitHub
> profile.
> @Florian, should this be updated to the stblinux repo instead?
> 
> >  F:	arch/arm/mach-bcm/
> >  N:	bcm281*
> >  N:	bcm113*
> > @@ -4055,7 +4055,7 @@ M:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >  R:	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
> >  L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> >  S:	Maintained
> > -T:	git git://github.com/broadcom/stblinux.git
> > +T:	git https://github.com/broadcom/stblinux.git
> >  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
> >  F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7*.dts*
> >  F:	arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/cache-b15-rac.h
> 
> Other than that, I clicked all the links - some look dead but that's not
> the point of this patch..

I realised I should clarify: s/some look dead/some look abandoned. Only
the one I pointed out above is actually a 404.

> 
> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>