From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30915C433FE for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 12:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229714AbiJ2Mvg (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:51:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229491AbiJ2Mvc (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:51:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF097604A6 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id e4so7001089pfl.2 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PgDXgk7FuLqSjYSHTukmMPrXTG+st9OsjiLo4n29idM=; b=JO2jd1Z/NOyQgrbn16cqUV0itG+chsiubmruSnr+e1dZ3/92RrvAQzLg895WyS1Df+ fWjlV6JpaStCXG/TYmpcd9VZ7CTYGiCkRL3Jrfw3I9V6MFBP7vUj/A24EIY6bdwDKojf bGgEQ3hqHZa+IhaEbPP1ZxZVqGlguDgU0QKbn9wvxKezXn/ZlDw+1oOS8doRGHEeXfIB mKtBRaePFwU122Xl+cq8gVbhaOG4B5eZ+wh4w/aVI69jDQXI1L7m1asqZIe3tTEyEorP t56wD++WXZwmyXSsTAyP1wn+GjiqyM9lGrpXLxmTIjWXaaZrzUYYTt759hrXEX9ALYl3 cEIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PgDXgk7FuLqSjYSHTukmMPrXTG+st9OsjiLo4n29idM=; b=ntILUWUf0FlTRsIaNrhJKZW5JzQWPqQEaPP+o80eh5ScC1CKVudbaTFFM9060gGVOc V31IOqnrWQBuOkdF2ZPSdwGIjktC/QaSkyercf+7L5xBI+Zjlnu6fgaBjQlRiW/prXrT M9pEleUWhsEwontep/Iyv1Q+uKbMpPNa9z9yFularoY1na/BdNdc7CvFFjQU4Ep+yZpB uo9p+HbOKtsC+iHdezA5/ypz4KpkOGsRqTNQhbr5BF4/bsnYHHrvYIBCmFD/PM59BhyV pWw6TmW+ma9nbgb3gyRg2XpGxjGHT1D1hl1RyDZFBtOscW9hP2JN3iljtLfDTKakkppC pCAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1BpWGMbxx6/wHfQMyw5/a+EwBkvkB5plQJBRWT2oD9rk3uy2x5 WG+lfwFJ9ivsoI3b/VI6ADaCnlXkq1qFAQu3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7Rizv+baGEcTKQ8pAHACKrvmaPnpMPXQuqYg4YWPbpxCN53T9CV9ybXlwAaUo8/Qr2nQf2KA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d66:0:b0:46f:8979:30e2 with SMTP id 38-20020a630d66000000b0046f897930e2mr1552827pgn.348.1667047890231; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.me (subs03-180-214-233-19.three.co.id. [180.214.233.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id im22-20020a170902bb1600b001769e6d4fafsm1233440plb.57.2022.10.29.05.51.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by debian.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDD9E10169F; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:51:25 +0700 (WIB) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:51:25 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Shaomin Deng Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: delete rebundant word in comments Message-ID: References: <20221029100431.10825-1-dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6r8c1Np5+DOCagk8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221029100431.10825-1-dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --6r8c1Np5+DOCagk8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 06:04:31AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote: > Delete the repeated word "that" in comments. >=20 Meh... On what comment? Also, on patch subject, s/rebundant/redundant/. > Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 27a3f29c0181..2ad2fec6ed3f 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -7053,7 +7053,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int orde= r, int highest_zoneidx) Ah! You mean balance_pgdat(). > =20 > /* > * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if > - * enough pages are already being scanned that that high > + * enough pages are already being scanned that high > * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency. > */ > if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc)) Dunno if the comment above is right. I have already say to fellow @cdjrlc.com people that you and your team **IGNORE** patch reviews. If you don't reply to this review, I would like to just say NAK. Thanks. --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --6r8c1Np5+DOCagk8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCY10hyQAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o4+DAQCjYXNm0mExgM3U/s8wV2lQP8WtQJNh7b/wCItI6EbYqgD/URc5d3dY3LYd 7gTUdFAbOY7i8ebUoZRi7Fmvv5F90wU= =gq3T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6r8c1Np5+DOCagk8--