From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add ability to update microcode even if rev is unchanged
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:51:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1AciYej2eQ/nNQA@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014200913.14644-14-ashok.raj@intel.com>
Hi Boris,
There is a minor bug in this force reload option I added for testing.
See below:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:09:13PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index eb2caa74de01..632c7a1fcffb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
>
> static struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops;
> static bool dis_ucode_ldr = true;
> +bool ucode_load_same;
>
> bool initrd_gone;
>
> @@ -542,11 +544,12 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
> goto wait_for_siblings;
> }
>
> - if (err >= UCODE_NFOUND) {
> - if (err == UCODE_ERROR)
> + if (ret || err >= UCODE_NFOUND) {
> + if (err == UCODE_ERROR ||
> + (err == UCODE_NFOUND && !ucode_load_same)) {
> pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu);
> -
> - ret = -1;
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> }
>
> wait_for_siblings:
> @@ -636,9 +639,12 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, µcode_pdev->dev, true);
> - if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
> + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW && !ucode_load_same)
> goto put;
>
> + if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
> + pr_info("Force loading ucode\n");
> +
The above needs additional check for UCODE_ERROR. If you are testing with
old microcode with minrev=0, noticed this went and tried to perform an
update without the UCODE_ERROR check.
I've queued for the next update.
- if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
+ if (tmp_ret == UCODE_ERROR ||
+ (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW && !ucode_load_same))
goto put;
+ if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
+ pr_info("Force loading ucode\n");
+
> mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
> ret = microcode_reload_late();
> mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
> @@ -841,6 +847,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group cpu_root_microcode_group = {
> static int __init microcode_init(void)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> + static struct dentry *dentry_ucode;
> int error;
>
> if (dis_ucode_ldr)
> @@ -884,7 +891,12 @@ static int __init microcode_init(void)
> cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/microcode:online",
> mc_cpu_online, mc_cpu_down_prep);
>
> + dentry_ucode = debugfs_create_dir("microcode", NULL);
> + debugfs_create_bool("load_same", 0644, dentry_ucode, &ucode_load_same);
> +
> pr_info("Microcode Update Driver: v%s.", DRIVER_VERSION);
> + pr_info("ucode_load_same is %s\n",
> + ucode_load_same ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index c61aa661ac2f..c9f1e6f5e53b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
> * already.
> */
> rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
> - if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
> + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev && !ucode_load_same) {
> ret = UCODE_OK;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
> return UCODE_ERROR;
> }
>
> - if (bsp && rev != prev_rev) {
> + if (bsp && (rev != prev_rev || ucode_load_same)) {
> pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
> rev,
> mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 20:09 [PATCH 00/13] Make microcode loading more robust Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev after early microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 13:30 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/microcode: Do not load from filesystem for CPU hot add Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 17:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/microcode: Simplify init path even more Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 19:22 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 19:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-20 8:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-20 15:04 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-21 9:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-21 10:21 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-21 10:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-21 11:39 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-21 13:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/microcode: Kill refresh_fw Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/microcode: Do some minor fixups Borislav Petkov
2022-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/microcode: Drop struct ucode_cpu_info.valid Borislav Petkov
2022-10-20 15:48 ` [PATCH -v2 1/5] x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk Borislav Petkov
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix a hang if early loading microcode fails Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/x2apic: Support x2apic self IPI with NMI_VECTOR Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 15:36 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/microcode: Rename refresh_fw to late_loading Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/microcode: Move late-load warning to earlier where kernel taint happens Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add minimum required revision to microcode header Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/microcode: Add a generic mechanism to declare support for minrev Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 4:03 ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-19 12:48 ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd() from microcode loading Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update is successful Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/mce: Warn of a microcode update is in progress when MCE arrives Ashok Raj
2022-10-14 20:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add ability to update microcode even if rev is unchanged Ashok Raj
2022-10-19 15:51 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1AciYej2eQ/nNQA@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®