From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0E5C4332F
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229902AbiJTJtK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:49:10 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41986 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S230358AbiJTJtF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:49:05 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2024A1911EB
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA78A61A6A
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8657C433D6;
        Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org;
        s=korg; t=1666259344;
        bh=ArItC3BXNQqmoJqU0IU4CgBBIR8F8BiOO99i69OVfd8=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=Ap6QQGEN4JmO3QMnXPPYArqSOGmUI4rdKT7+/qXtJnOGiGZuym4rz493nTWlASz5Z
         kuMwr2nrP3D/CxmxUJt7Vvfwh0xrwRc9qZBja6CEhcw7ZZ87FkG6WAUnlbwbA41ZJG
         Eu10kTXn9Ur1+7/WMxSWaL6+eOJTNdurodfQa+aU=
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:49:01 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     cuijinpeng666@gmail.com
Cc:     jstultz@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, sboyd@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zaelci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] clocksource: Use strscpy() instead of
 strlcpy()
Message-ID: <Y1EZjQiquw+14Ioc@kroah.com>
References: <20221020091312.398909-1-cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221020091312.398909-1-cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:13:12AM +0000, cuijinpeng666@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
> 
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zaelci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


Please ignore based on this response:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@kroah.com