From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:42:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1IxXviByW9/jCgr@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019165618.927057-6-seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:56:15PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Track the number of TDP MMU "shadow" pages instead of tracking the pages
> themselves. With the NX huge page list manipulation moved out of the common
> linking flow, elminating the list-based tracking means the happy path of
> adding a shadow page doesn't need to acquire a spinlock and can instead
> inc/dec an atomic.
>
> Keep the tracking as the WARN during TDP MMU teardown on leaked shadow
> pages is very, very useful for detecting KVM bugs.
>
> Tracking the number of pages will also make it trivial to expose the
> counter to userspace as a stat in the future, which may or may not be
> desirable.
>
> Note, the TDP MMU needs to use a separate counter (and stat if that ever
> comes to be) from the existing n_used_mmu_pages. The TDP MMU doesn't bother
> supporting the shrinker nor does it honor KVM_SET_NR_MMU_PAGES (because the
> TDP MMU consumes so few pages relative to shadow paging), and including TDP
> MMU pages in that counter would break both the shrinker and shadow MMUs,
> e.g. if a VM is using nested TDP.
>
> Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 11 +++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 0333dbb8ec85..bbd2cecd34cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1290,6 +1290,9 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> */
> bool tdp_mmu_enabled;
>
> + /* The number of TDP MMU pages across all roots. */
> + atomic64_t tdp_mmu_pages;
> +
> /*
> * List of kvm_mmu_page structs being used as roots.
> * All kvm_mmu_page structs in the list should have
> @@ -1310,18 +1313,10 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> */
> struct list_head tdp_mmu_roots;
>
> - /*
> - * List of kvm_mmu_page structs not being used as roots.
> - * All kvm_mmu_page structs in the list should have
> - * tdp_mmu_page set and a tdp_mmu_root_count of 0.
> - */
> - struct list_head tdp_mmu_pages;
> -
> /*
> * Protects accesses to the following fields when the MMU lock
> * is held in read mode:
> * - tdp_mmu_roots (above)
> - * - tdp_mmu_pages (above)
> * - the link field of kvm_mmu_page structs used by the TDP MMU
> * - possible_nx_huge_pages;
> * - the possible_nx_huge_page_link field of kvm_mmu_page structs used
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 059231c82345..4e5b3ae824c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ int kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled = true;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots);
> spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq = wq;
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> /* Also waits for any queued work items. */
> destroy_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
>
> - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
> + WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots));
>
> /*
> @@ -377,11 +376,13 @@ static void handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
> static void tdp_account_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, +1);
> + atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> }
>
> static void tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, -1);
> + atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -397,17 +398,17 @@ static void tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> bool shared)
> {
> tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
> +
> + if (!sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed)
> + return;
> +
> if (shared)
> spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> else
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> - list_del(&sp->link);
> -
> - if (sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed) {
> - sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = false;
> - untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
> - }
> + sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = false;
> + untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
>
> if (shared)
> spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> @@ -1140,9 +1141,6 @@ static int tdp_mmu_link_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
> tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, spte);
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> - list_add(&sp->link, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
> - spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> tdp_account_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 16:56 [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Tag disallowed NX huge pages even if they're not tracked Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename NX huge pages fields/functions for consistency Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Properly account NX huge page workaround for nonpaging MMUs Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Set disallowed_nx_huge_page in TDP MMU before setting SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 5:46 ` Yan Zhao
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 5:42 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helper to convert SPTE value to its shadow page Sean Christopherson
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: explicitly check nx_hugepage in disallowed_hugepage_adjust() Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 5:41 ` Yan Zhao
2022-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if TDP MMU SP disallows hugepage after being zapped Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 5:41 ` Yan Zhao
2022-11-02 17:35 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1IxXviByW9/jCgr@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®