From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA08C3A59D for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230457AbiJWTnP (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:43:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229515AbiJWTnN (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:43:13 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A586D9E4 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:43:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1666554190; x=1698090190; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xp5Pci4q5yMQDVFclxASw/sPQ/p2M+cUd1XOZbOa8ow=; b=PenkcLQdDxM9srqKkuMQi4cPlA25zp6O6UR1eijG/x6VTfQsumGFFmdN /FNxWJZYMaEkQ/Vf+7dXhr4t1sRNE2FP7jKdM0feEya8zNIk+48qNWG1G QwTicPoS0SNzK5tnlkid/n/seu+QSOLr/jpGbDLdsfQP93K8dKBp5wpi1 vWL8q7aW1kYea2zHSWEzbi70H+xKd696/jP2kxlw8/g1KGu4ZJmbNSoGP 5U7ycxXLS16paMxEJy0wqP61VSWTrwECGtwgFLkD++8qDH2L3XADvG2hM ivUJXPoCxkiKfNrvKcRpM1j6ew/elLt4scX80HvwfrMYvLmfEjDQEp68/ g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10509"; a="307286057" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,207,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="307286057" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Oct 2022 12:43:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10509"; a="773614725" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,207,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="773614725" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2022 12:43:08 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1omgsF-0016hK-2C; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:43:07 +0300 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:43:07 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: kernel test robot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [driver-core:driver-core-testing] BUILD SUCCESS 59789f3418dd3c0a187490d49e900a59a5c8d732 Message-ID: References: <635484ed.ADi+2sBza+UlAhjj%lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 02:33:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 08:03:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git driver-core-testing > > branch HEAD: 59789f3418dd3c0a187490d49e900a59a5c8d732 device property: Constify parameter in device_dma_supported() and device_get_dma_attr() > > > > Unverified Warning (likely false positive, please contact us if interested): > > > > drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c:155 iio_hwmon_probe() warn: could not determine type of argument 4 > > Andy, this is due to your changes, here's the offending code: > > sname = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pfwP", dev_fwnode(dev)); > > Now that dev_fwnode() is an inline function, the compiler is confused as > to what function to select? Maybe, I don't know, it seems odd, can you > look into it? Hmm... I can't reproduce on my side. Any (additional) information about compiler, architecture, etc? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko