From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/79] 5.10.151-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:58:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1u10qtld2FjOncq@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1uzP3FJibb1UIlt@debian>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.151 release.
> > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221016):
> mips: 63 configs -> no failure
> arm: 104 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 3 configs -> 1 failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
>
> Note:
> 1) arm64 allmodconfig fails to build with the error:
> In file included from drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:10:
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:245:25: error: 'tegra194_cpufreq_of_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra194_cpufreq_data'?
> 245 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/module.h:241:15: note: in definition of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 241 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~
> ./include/linux/module.h:241:21: error: conflicting types for '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table'; have 'const struct of_device_id[2]'
> 241 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~~~
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:380:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 380 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/module.h:241:21: note: previous declaration of '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table' with type 'int'
> 241 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~~~
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:245:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 245 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> git bisect pointed to a327a52c9930 ("cpufreq: tegra194: Fix module loading")
Now dropped.
> 2) Already reported by others:
> scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Permission denied
Will be fixed up by hand.
I'll be doing a new 5.10.y release in a few minutes and start a new
round of -rc review for it to resolve this...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 16:55 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 5.10 67/79] fcntl: make F_GETOWN(EX) return 0 on dead owner task Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/79] 5.10.151-rc1 review Guenter Roeck
2022-10-27 19:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 19:27 ` Pavel Machek
2022-10-27 19:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-27 19:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-10-27 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-10-28 11:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-28 10:47 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-28 10:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-10-28 11:58 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-28 12:21 ` Pavel Machek
2022-10-28 13:59 ` Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1u10qtld2FjOncq@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®