From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96373C38A02 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230213AbiJ1NBR (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:01:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230201AbiJ1NBH (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:01:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB62A5755E for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 06:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id s196so4780317pgs.3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 06:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Cj+cFSWB3bhdp7XduUn/4e2RygvL5XBdKHCLMG1Ezq8=; b=O6DaBoYnrcEcnm5eNCgvLRdsvuRtP7sVUc53dIggCP1DPm/qe0sU0YU3hry8fF88Lk 90/QvKXOpeYgxtHvLnr1urLL7z1Hj5U57/qK+4GHnxieBr7sTcDfp/7APxH1CHZJ8A/W 7eU3z+sn87mU6P2hb1J1skJpForlSSu1Y9FtryeAC7xUgWnyBJGf3fzK6ZTrBswAPmQB Qeox2vWn2h7ltJbf+DvHMUAqRTMcC82Y8VMgMWocKvP8xQggaln1KxANCQ+96g49HyA+ 9DKFsZCTQwn2Ax9kdfL/Vv/EmpQj46mrlAMA6MmY1x5msu3/bRBM9ZTXoqe7VZpz6zQ7 tQjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Cj+cFSWB3bhdp7XduUn/4e2RygvL5XBdKHCLMG1Ezq8=; b=qAfNMUaS5EWxAwkBVaWyGMbrKB3vMnk60f1247aqOXWin2Q+oSelDNIohyRVkTNenH Ny0X6njJ3cvm/D3vGWwpvX2TDWlUMp5LvzGY65ezacBf+Tm0HwJdNpEJRtGOdgTQhQqi uJXSi/lIXP6UuJBQ0pP7BOGtg8plbw01y0Lf/4Wa1X2mgeBixy8OqCp26kpJGLCuMfqG 5QN9s81rdruhYPti6yuP8uuPfc1DnCQbMz2vyUzTGCffgsBCOHxDWEL+ZHol2/bIC6ju cncsdJnnlgkOJN7ZsyGgGsx+Wv4fQICu3znIKveF03UekYh021KJq01X3k5DNJRDhsxU MJNg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf29moXx7kCjqeLhlzdpfDV6iVt9mYVw83Un8xdFwbXW0yUA27ti H5tQ5xFosWqCFWhHW4O2CpHa8+rZYeDKdp4D X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6LSRa1cWipx9sEb0JvczrXkVEj0/vqjDyiNWRWZcl9wt128WQw5AkN25ESjk4UgWXRc/bnBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1348:b0:56b:f5c0:1d9d with SMTP id k8-20020a056a00134800b0056bf5c01d9dmr23236578pfu.45.1666962065722; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 06:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.me (subs03-180-214-233-72.three.co.id. [180.214.233.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n11-20020a17090a394b00b0020d45a155d9sm4181687pjf.35.2022.10.28.06.01.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 06:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by debian.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77EF810030A; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 20:01:01 +0700 (WIB) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 20:01:01 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: mac: Reword comment using double "in" Message-ID: References: <0229879ee3e2d8828707d291cddbb89ac18a10c2.1666945731.git.geert@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ANg38O8+lLGM5VLB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0229879ee3e2d8828707d291cddbb89ac18a10c2.1666945731.git.geert@linux-m68k.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ANg38O8+lLGM5VLB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:30:26AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > People keep on sending (incorrect) patches to remove the second > occurrence of the word "in". Reword the comment to stop the inflood. >=20 Ah! People who aren't fluent in English think that duplicated "in" below isn't OK, which after stripping that become nonsense without reading the actual code. > Suggested-by: Michael Schmitz > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > To be queued in the m68k branch for v6.2. Should this patch be Cc: stable'ed so that no more trivial patches as you mentioned? >=20 > arch/m68k/mac/misc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c b/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c > index 4fab3479175865d4..c7cb29f0ff016360 100644 > --- a/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c > +++ b/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void via_rtc_send(__u8 data) > =20 > reg =3D via1[vBufB] & ~(VIA1B_vRTCClk | VIA1B_vRTCData); > =20 > - /* The bits of the byte go in in MSB order */ > + /* The bits of the byte go into the RTC in MSB order */ > =20 LGTM, thanks. Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --ANg38O8+lLGM5VLB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCY1vSjQAKCRD2uYlJVVFO oyl/AQCne+PlmVryq56xblbXyNvF0nK68wyPIgtQsuuVuAffqgD9HImvqkpYnVhU JHDcJ8W1xI/YfhNBJO7wcrEhDt0+nAw= =9DZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ANg38O8+lLGM5VLB--