From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D356C4332F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232077AbiKGKZn (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 05:25:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35658 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232000AbiKGKZU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 05:25:20 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59F318E38 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 02:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435C760FA6 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16634C433D6; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1667816676; bh=UN7DouiwZqYbJ8Kr8Qr8SGnYbyDiieyj0GbObFbu7iQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2MTd/A1Ew2D4OPV0ruvc5fxUZPGR815QOblpJsTkMNr8ahAJqslZDU1da23xkftW9 K4sRt5VgmAYQy9P0LBm2zV3bvwg19FKj7inzpr6tAHxL0tFdHIOT6kJwmTM5RwG0AP uT4NjHqaETDkGF+QDn32o4Ft6J0az6VbWqSzUvS0= Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:24:33 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Suzuki K Poulose Cc: James Clark , stable@kernel.org, Aishwarya TCV , Cristian Marussi , Mike Leach , Mathieu Poirier , Leo Yan , Alexander Shishkin , coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() Message-ID: References: <20221102112003.2318583-1-james.clark@arm.com> <4d44d2c8-a8ec-1729-d3cc-9ae8beb48045@arm.com> <99b25aab-ba87-b875-9f5f-c7dd9444b8c8@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99b25aab-ba87-b875-9f5f-c7dd9444b8c8@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:59:24AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 07/11/2022 09:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:23:26AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > > On 07/11/2022 09:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:20:03AM +0000, James Clark wrote: > > > > > commit 6746eae4bbaddcc16b40efb33dab79210828b3ce upstream. > > > > > > > > Isn't this commit 665c157e0204176023860b51a46528ba0ba62c33 instead? > > > > > > This was reverted in commit d76308f03ee1 and pushed in later > > > with fixups as 6746eae4bbadd. > > > > So which should be applied? > > Sorry, this particular post is a backport for v5.10 stable branch. > > > > > confused, > > Now I am too. What is expected here ? My understanding is, we > should stick the "upstream" commit that is getting backported > at the beginning of the commit description. In that sense, > the commit id in this patch looks correct to me. Please let > me know if this is not the case. > > As such, this is only for 5.10.x branch. The rest are taken > care of. > > Please let us know if we are something missing. We already have commit 665c157e0204176023860b51a46528ba0ba62c33 queued up in the 5.10 stable queue. Is that not correct? It has the same subject line as this one. Still confused. thanks, greg k-h