From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24E4C4332F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234796AbiKHNzj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:55:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234694AbiKHNzg (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:55:36 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC4CEA1; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 05:55:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667915736; x=1699451736; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hSs/9wNT0EGOI37Oz+MQ6xPOM6Ayl887RbLjJ+yFmkQ=; b=J7ycUe4d3M0SwNviI1TAyjDHa06HYFCJL2YeRoCZfJfd0fVf/u73fi/+ ZBziE0YzaN8qIlzNB8wSkO+fxuH8MtT/xfMgtzc6aSObW4CAOGI16fVVv 9Jj6ocHnWty4lmyCX42XfLuOGQxMbAEsBp9u6KLmOGPabPEE0Ki1gDmzH aPzPltK/kW94MUnSO//53zLyopmtRMZQoX0GaboUiubGXONnG8kTNeWTB gQiDhFJA18t8+Xsh6JxP+XjRmkuTJ6A8YpxrKy8QtR5uvPiE2RsWLjfFV EhPW60SaQRgFVFV3R1nTvYrr/8kz1cEDl9UdxYI5hlND4Z0ZV6n0ezRAU A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="372838955" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,147,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="372838955" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2022 05:55:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10524"; a="636338939" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,147,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="636338939" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2022 05:55:33 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1osP4d-0099md-27; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:55:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:55:31 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mac_pton: Don't access memory over expected length Message-ID: References: <20221005164301.14381-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20221010173809.5f863ea6@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:51:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 05:38:09PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: ... > So, what is the decision with this patch? Should I resend that with net-next > in the subject? Found the answer in the other mail in this thread :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko