From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2694DC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229935AbiKIJS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 04:18:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55056 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229863AbiKIJSy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 04:18:54 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05DA11A16 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 01:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e7e8329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e7e8:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 04B0A1EC03B9; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:18:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1667985530; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=g3vb+dym2f7hDYWgaTPK/jkPVxUpW10raqA5lI2Jv7s=; b=aNkdZugoSS1fHpFm22niFpo+q4nM6mDr0OGGKKVv+Vfr/rxHebAgArqtrATFfaQN1rKHJ3 xHHMEKZE7DnHkWS4g8DT0JPLC3cHP5OwWn8K23+GkLxFP2c1fhJ2y57y2YfrDnJkOXROvz BFYFEHV6n89NZRvEgp642Nvww8xHDqg= Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:18:44 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ashok Raj Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Mailing List , X86-kernel , Tony Luck , Dave Hansen , Arjan van de Ven , Andy Lutomirski , Jacon Jun Pan , Tom Lendacky , Kai Huang , Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [v2 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Prevent printing updated microcode rev multiple times Message-ID: References: <20221103175901.164783-1-ashok.raj@intel.com> <20221103175901.164783-2-ashok.raj@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:06:20PM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote: > That's correct, my thought as well. Did you get a chance to review rest of > the patches? Dave had a spot-on response to one of your colleagues pinging impatiently the same way: "Things are a bit busy in the review queue at the moment. As always, we'd love help reviewing stuff. So, while you're waiting for us to review this, could you perhaps look around and find a series that's also hurting for review tags?" So how about you help out with review while waiting? Ashok, I'll say this only once: if you don't stop this impatient pinging and the private bullsh*t emails - them especially! - I will ignore you completely. We've documented it all: "You should receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during busy times like merge windows." And yes, those rules apply to you too. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette