From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: do not prepare new memslot for KVM_MR_DELETE
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:14:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2xedK4QwJ1DsdlD@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2xZq8Xn0Bk4de+R@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:53:47AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > kvm_prepare_memory_region() is not useful for KVM_MR_DELETE,
> > and each kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() does nothing more than returning
> > 0 for KVM_MR_DELETE.
>
> This is not true, s390 has an error path that fires in the DELETE case.
>
> /* When we are protected, we should not change the memory slots */
> if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE || change == KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY)
> return 0;
>
>
> > So, just don't call into kvm_prepare_memory_region() to avoid unnecessary
> > error handling for KVM_MR_DELETE.
>
> Even if the s390 case didn't exit, I would still prefer keeping the code as is.
> I agree that a "dummy" call is somewhat confusing, but skipping the arch call
> for one operation is equally confusing and could easily lead to future bugs,
> e.g. if the order of changes were reversed and an s390 developer wasn't aware
> that s390's arch hook would be bypassed on memslot deletion.
yes, you are right!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 1:22 Yan Zhao
2022-11-10 1:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-10 2:14 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2xedK4QwJ1DsdlD@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®