From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, cong.wang@bytedance.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
tom@herbertland.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] kcm: Fix kernel NULL pointer dereference in requeue_rx_msgs
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 16:55:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3GR89nyWvTwHulH@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221112120423.56132-1-wanghai38@huawei.com>
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 08:04:23PM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
> In kcm_rcv_strparser(), the skb is queued to the kcm that is currently
> being reserved, and if the queue is full, unreserve_rx_kcm() will be
> called. At this point, if KCM_RECV_DISABLE is set, then unreserve_rx_kcm()
> will requeue received messages for the current kcm socket to other kcm
> sockets. The kcm sock lock is not held during this time, and as long as
> someone calls kcm_recvmsg, it will concurrently unlink the same skb, which
> ill result in a null pointer reference.
>
> cpu0 cpu1 cpu2
> kcm_rcv_strparser
> reserve_rx_kcm
> kcm_setsockopt
> kcm_recv_disable
> kcm->rx_disabled = 1;
> kcm_queue_rcv_skb
> unreserve_rx_kcm
> requeue_rx_msgs kcm_recvmsg
> __skb_dequeue
> __skb_unlink(skb) skb_unlink(skb)
> //double unlink skb
>
We will hold skb queue lock after my patch, so this will not happen after
applying my patch below?
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20221114005119.597905-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com/
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-12 12:04 Wang Hai
2022-11-14 0:55 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2022-11-14 1:24 ` wanghai (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3GR89nyWvTwHulH@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=wanghai38@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®