From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
balbi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: f_hid: Conduct proper refcounting on shared f_hidg pointer
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:59:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3er7nenAhbmBdBy@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3dIXUmjTfJLpPe7@google.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:54:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:46:26PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:08:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > +static inline bool f_hidg_is_open(struct f_hidg *hidg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return !!kref_read(&hidg->cdev.kobj.kref);
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > Ick, sorry, no, that's not going to work and is not allowed at all.
> > > > That's some major layering violations there, AND it can change after you
> > > > get the value as well.
> > >
> > > This cdev belongs solely to this driver. Hence the *.*.* and not
> > > *->*->*. What is preventing us from reading our own data? If we
> > > cannot do this directly, can I create an API to do it 'officially'?
> > >
> > > I do, however, appreciate that a little locking wouldn't go amiss.
> > >
> > > If this solution is not acceptable either, then we're left up the
> > > creak without a paddle. The rules you've communicated are not
> > > compatible with each other.
> > >
> > > Rule 1: Only one item in a data structure can reference count.
> > >
> > > Due to the embedded cdev struct, this rules out my first solution of
> > > giving f_hidg its own kref so that it can conduct its own life-time
> > > management.
> > >
> > > A potential option to satisfy this rule would be to remove the cdev
> > > attribute and create its data dynamically instead. However, the
> > > staticness of cdev is used to obtain f_hidg (with container_of()) in
> > > the character device handling component, so it cannot be removed.
> >
> > You have not understood this rule correctly. Only one item in a data
> > structure can hold a reference count _for that structure_. But several
> > items in a structure can hold reference counts for themselves.
>
> Here was the review comment I was working to on this patch [0]:
>
> "While at first glance, it seems that f_hidg is not reference
> counted, it really is, with the embedded "struct cdev" a few lines
> above this.
>
> That is the reference count that should control the lifecycle of
> this object, not another reference here in the "outer layer"
> structure."
It's worth noting that the review comment goes on to say:
"But, the cdev api is tricky and messy and not really set up to control
the lifecycle of objects it is embedded in."
This is a good indication that a separate reference counter really is
needed (in fact it almost contradicts what was written above).
> > So for example, you could put a kref in f_hidg which would hold the
> > reference count for the f_hidg structure, while at the same time
> > including an embedded cdev with its own reference counter. The point is
> > that the refcount in the embedded cdev refers to the lifetime of the
> > cdev, not the lifetime of the f_hidg.
>
> This was the approach in the original submission [1], which during
> review I was told was unacceptable for the aforementioned reason.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1PnoMvDmZMqXScw@kroah.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221017112737.230772-1-lee@kernel.org/
>
> > To make this work properly, you have to do two additional things:
> >
> > When the cdev's refcount is initialized, increment the kref
> > in f_hidg.
> >
> > When the cdev's refcount drops to 0, decrement the kref (and
> > release f_hidg if the kref hits 0).
>
> More than happy to revisit the first solution with Greg's blessing.
Okay, let's see what Greg thinks after he reads this discussion.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 12:08 Lee Jones
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:26 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 17:38 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:46 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 16:47 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-18 8:54 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-18 15:59 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2022-11-18 16:37 ` John Keeping
2022-11-18 21:07 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-20 17:22 ` John Keeping
2022-11-20 20:46 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 12:30 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-21 12:38 ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 16:18 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 18:54 ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 19:17 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-22 11:52 ` John Keeping
2022-11-22 8:31 ` Lee Jones
2022-11-22 11:55 ` John Keeping
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 11:27 Lee Jones
2022-10-22 12:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-24 7:17 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3er7nenAhbmBdBy@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome