mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	balbi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: f_hid: Conduct proper refcounting on shared f_hidg pointer
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:59:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3er7nenAhbmBdBy@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3dIXUmjTfJLpPe7@google.com>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:54:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:46:26PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:08:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > +static inline bool f_hidg_is_open(struct f_hidg *hidg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	return !!kref_read(&hidg->cdev.kobj.kref);
> > > > > +}
> > > > 
> > > > Ick, sorry, no, that's not going to work and is not allowed at all.
> > > > That's some major layering violations there, AND it can change after you
> > > > get the value as well.
> > > 
> > > This cdev belongs solely to this driver.  Hence the *.*.* and not
> > > *->*->*.  What is preventing us from reading our own data?  If we
> > > cannot do this directly, can I create an API to do it 'officially'?
> > > 
> > > I do, however, appreciate that a little locking wouldn't go amiss.
> > > 
> > > If this solution is not acceptable either, then we're left up the
> > > creak without a paddle.  The rules you've communicated are not
> > > compatible with each other.
> > > 
> > > Rule 1: Only one item in a data structure can reference count.
> > > 
> > > Due to the embedded cdev struct, this rules out my first solution of
> > > giving f_hidg its own kref so that it can conduct its own life-time
> > > management.
> > > 
> > > A potential option to satisfy this rule would be to remove the cdev
> > > attribute and create its data dynamically instead.  However, the
> > > staticness of cdev is used to obtain f_hidg (with container_of()) in
> > > the character device handling component, so it cannot be removed.
> > 
> > You have not understood this rule correctly.  Only one item in a data 
> > structure can hold a reference count _for that structure_.  But several 
> > items in a structure can hold reference counts for themselves.
> 
> Here was the review comment I was working to on this patch [0]:
> 
>  "While at first glance, it seems that f_hidg is not reference
>   counted, it really is, with the embedded "struct cdev" a few lines
>   above this.
> 
>   That is the reference count that should control the lifecycle of
>   this object, not another reference here in the "outer layer"
>   structure."

It's worth noting that the review comment goes on to say:

 "But, the cdev api is tricky and messy and not really set up to control
  the lifecycle of objects it is embedded in."

This is a good indication that a separate reference counter really is 
needed (in fact it almost contradicts what was written above).

> > So for example, you could put a kref in f_hidg which would hold the 
> > reference count for the f_hidg structure, while at the same time 
> > including an embedded cdev with its own reference counter.  The point is 
> > that the refcount in the embedded cdev refers to the lifetime of the 
> > cdev, not the lifetime of the f_hidg.
> 
> This was the approach in the original submission [1], which during
> review I was told was unacceptable for the aforementioned reason.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1PnoMvDmZMqXScw@kroah.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221017112737.230772-1-lee@kernel.org/
> 
> > To make this work properly, you have to do two additional things:
> > 
> > 	When the cdev's refcount is initialized, increment the kref
> > 	in f_hidg.
> > 
> > 	When the cdev's refcount drops to 0, decrement the kref (and
> > 	release f_hidg if the kref hits 0).
> 
> More than happy to revisit the first solution with Greg's blessing.

Okay, let's see what Greg thinks after he reads this discussion.

Alan Stern

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 12:08 Lee Jones
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:26   ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 17:38     ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 12:50 ` Greg KH
2022-11-17 13:46   ` Lee Jones
2022-11-17 16:47     ` Alan Stern
2022-11-18  8:54       ` Lee Jones
2022-11-18 15:59         ` Alan Stern [this message]
2022-11-18 16:37           ` John Keeping
2022-11-18 21:07             ` Alan Stern
2022-11-20 17:22               ` John Keeping
2022-11-20 20:46                 ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 12:30                   ` Lee Jones
2022-11-21 12:38                   ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 16:18                     ` Alan Stern
2022-11-21 18:54                       ` John Keeping
2022-11-21 19:17                         ` Alan Stern
2022-11-22 11:52                           ` John Keeping
2022-11-22  8:31                         ` Lee Jones
2022-11-22 11:55                           ` John Keeping
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 11:27 Lee Jones
2022-10-22 12:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-24  7:17   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3er7nenAhbmBdBy@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome