mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Li zeming <zeming@nfschina.com>
Cc: gregory.clement@bootlin.com, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-mvebu: coherency: Judgment after pointer p increases allocation
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:19:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3wVmPQFVesgmpxN@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121100122.36528-1-zeming@nfschina.com>

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:01:22PM +0800, Li zeming wrote:
> Add judgment statements at the position after pointer p allocates memory
> to avoid the abnormal impact of low probability allocation failure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@nfschina.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
> index a6b621ff0b87..2bc69dd059d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
> @@ -191,8 +191,10 @@ static void __init armada_375_380_coherency_init(struct device_node *np)
>  		struct property *p;
>  
>  		p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		p->name = kstrdup("arm,io-coherent", GFP_KERNEL);
> -		of_add_property(cache_dn, p);
> +		if (p) {
> +			p->name = kstrdup("arm,io-coherent", GFP_KERNEL);
> +			of_add_property(cache_dn, p);
> +		}

The comment before this says:
	/*
	 * Add the PL310 property "arm,io-coherent". This makes sure the
	 * outer sync operation is not used, which allows to
	 * workaround the system erratum that causes deadlocks when
	 * doing PCIe in an SMP situation on Armada 375 and Armada
	 * 38x.
	 */

Skipping adding the property because we are out of memory is probably
not a good idea, it is going to cause very hard to find deadlocks.
Actually being out of memory so early in the boot indicates something
very bad is going on anyway. So i think dereferencing the NULL pointer
is the least of our worries.

If you really want to do some sort of check here, BUG_ON(!p);

   Andrew

      reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 10:01 Li zeming
2022-11-22  0:19 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3wVmPQFVesgmpxN@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=zeming@nfschina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®