From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5544CC4332F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233223AbiKVNi6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:38:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38210 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232844AbiKVNiz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:38:55 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F0E59874; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 05:38:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669124334; x=1700660334; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=++lP3KudX1Bg9p4n7EIiOiN/6GstJqa2TC078+e0FNM=; b=IFOVHr1gDoiJgoyyVP2631VGble6XGm0kVZZ4WHU/0sGIrKzT3cHFYYM 4BwSpqyKBev6ewCzRyDwXP1RdynCVmI2Rb6LR/MqLtmij7GcG+TpEH0eY c4ds38xWRAg3uVSbTYXJAmwWGj5IMQRfrTUq+iERvGEHUAlN11EyCbT46 /1tn3t49X9w0IHd5DURhGEQRIcENdmidxl1DK4jNprOlK5ac8icYN5Msk 68Ciw8GxNhhx1tGgotX7Guea4RX9aLKzi00koASDWlYPtDx4HkKpgZVjD uQWtUKj98R+KoMVEEIEZh2fdJdLtMhs49A1xIH89aO57g1/h3Ek8capQ5 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10539"; a="378072259" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,184,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="378072259" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2022 05:38:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10539"; a="674349310" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,184,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="674349310" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2022 05:38:48 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTU5-00Fqhm-2v; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:38:45 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:38:45 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Lee Jones , Gene Chen , Andrew Jeffery , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Matthias Brugger , Sean Wang , Kurt Kanzenbach , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] leds: deduplicate led_init_default_state_get() Message-ID: References: <20220906135004.14885-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:47:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:11:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:53:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:49:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > There are several users of LED framework that reimplement the > > > > > > > > > functionality of led_init_default_state_get(). In order to > > > > > > > > > deduplicate them move the declaration to the global header > > > > > > > > > (patch 2) and convert users (patche 3-11). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear LED maintainers, is there any news on this series? It's hanging around > > > > > > > > for almost 2 months now... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My offer still stands if help is required. > > > > > > > > > > > > From my point of view the LED subsystem is quite laggish lately (as shown by > > > > > > this patch series, for instance), which means that _in practice_ the help is > > > > > > needed, but I haven't got if we have any administrative agreement on that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavel? > > > > > > > > > > So, Pavel seems quite unresponsive lately... Shall we just move on and take > > > > > maintainership? > > > > > > > > I had an off-line conversation with Greg who advised me against that. > > > > > > OK. What the reasonable option we have then? > > > > I thought there is now a new LED maintainer, is that not working out? > > No new (co-)maintainer due to stale mate situation as far as I can read it > right now. So, any suggestion on how to proceed here? De facto we have no patch flow in LED subsystem and the queue is growing... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko