From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce short duration task check
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:38:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y44CdKrQoFKGH+1j@chenyu5-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtA61DDk-VbNDvAycp8Et5fTwaOS=Q3559rBF7QDHDpJfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-12-05 at 10:59:06 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 09:39, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> > On 2022-12-03 at 10:35:46 -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Dec 3, 2022, at 2:50 AM, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Honglei,
> > > >> On 2022-12-02 at 15:44:18 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 2022/12/1 16:44, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > >>> Introduce short-duration task checks, as there is requirement
> > > >>> to leverage this attribute for better task placement.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There are several choices of metrics that could be used to
> > > >>> indicate if a task is a short-duration task.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> At first thought the (p->se.sum_exec_runtime / p->nvcsw)
> > > >>> could be used to measure the task duration. However, the
> > > >>> history long past was factored too heavily in such a formula.
> > > >>> Ideally, the old activity should decay and not affect
> > > >>> the current status too much.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Although something based on PELT could be used, se.util_avg might
> > > >>> not be appropriate to describe the task duration:
> > > >>> 1. Task p1 and task p2 are doing frequent ping-pong scheduling on
> > > >>> one CPU, both p1 and p2 have a short duration, but the util_avg
> > > >>> can be up to 50%.
> > > >>> 2. Suppose a task lasting less than 4ms is regarded as a short task.
> > > >>> If task p3 runs for 6ms and sleeps for 32ms, p3 should not be a
> > > >>> short-duration task. However, PELT would decay p3's accumulated
> > > >>> running time from 6ms to 3ms, because 32ms is the half-life in PELT.
> > > >>> As a result, p3 would be incorrectly treated as a short task.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It was found that there was once a similar feature to track the
> > > >>> duration of a task, which is in Commit ad4b78bbcbab ("sched: Add
> > > >>> new wakeup preemption mode: WAKEUP_RUNNING"). Unfortunately, it
> > > >>> was reverted because it was an experiment. So pick the patch up
> > > >>> again, by recording the average duration when a task voluntarily
> > > >>> switches out. Introduce SIS_SHORT to control this strategy.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The threshold of short duration reuses sysctl_sched_min_granularity,
> > > >>> so it can be tuned by the user. Ideally there should be a dedicated
> > > >>> parameter for the threshold, but that might introduce complexity.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
> > > >>> Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> > > >>> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
> > > >>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > >>> kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
> > > >>> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > >>> index ffb6eb55cd13..64b7acb77a11 100644
> > > >>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > >>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > >>> @@ -558,6 +558,10 @@ struct sched_entity {
> > > >>> u64 nr_migrations;
> > > >>> + u64 prev_sum_exec_runtime_vol;
> > > >>> + /* average duration of a task */
> > > >>> + u64 dur_avg;
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > > >>> int depth;
> > > >>> struct sched_entity *parent;
> > > >>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > >>> index daff72f00385..c5202f1be3f7 100644
> > > >>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > >>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > >>> @@ -4348,6 +4348,8 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> > > >>> p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
> > > >>> p->se.nr_migrations = 0;
> > > >>> p->se.vruntime = 0;
> > > >>> + p->se.dur_avg = 0;
> > > >>> + p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime_vol = 0;
> > > >>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
> > > >>> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > > >>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > >>> index e4a0b8bd941c..a4b314b664f8 100644
> > > >>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > >>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > >>> @@ -6200,6 +6200,16 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
> > > >>> return 1;
> > > >>> }
> > > >>> +/*
> > > >>> + * If a task switches in and then voluntarily relinquishes the
> > > >>> + * CPU quickly, it is regarded as a short duration task.
> > > >>> + */
> > > >>> +static inline int is_short_task(struct task_struct *p)
> > > >>> +{
> > > >>> + return sched_feat(SIS_SHORT) &&
> > > >>> + (p->se.dur_avg <= sysctl_sched_min_granularity);
> > > >>> +}
> > > >>> +
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Yu,
> > > >>
> > > >> I still have a bit concern about the sysctl_sched_min_granularity stuff..
> > > >> This grab can be set to different value which will impact the action of this
> > > >> patch and make things not totally under control.
> > >
> > > There are already ways to misconfigure sched sysctl to make bad/weird things happen.
> > >
> > > >> Not sure if we can add a new grab for this.. The test result shows good
> > > >> improvement for short task, and with this grab, admins will be able to
> > > >> custom the system base on their own 'short task' view.
> > > >>
> > > > It would be ideal to have a dedicated parameter to tweak this. For example,
> > > > something under /sys/kernel/debug/sched/, and initilized to sysctl_sched_min_granularity
> > > > by default.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to not have to introduce a new knob for this. IMO, min_granularity is reasonable.
> > >
> > OK, got it, thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Sorry for the late answer.
> We don't want to add more dedicated knobs. So using
> sysctl_sched_min_granularity as you are doing in this patch looks ok
>
I see, thanks Vincent.
thanks,
Chenyu
> >
> > thanks,
> > Chenyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 8:43 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/fair: Choose the CPU where short task is running during wake up Chen Yu
2022-12-01 8:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce short duration task check Chen Yu
2022-12-02 7:44 ` Honglei Wang
2022-12-03 7:49 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-03 15:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-05 8:38 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-05 9:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-12-05 14:38 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2022-12-07 2:23 ` Josh Don
2022-12-07 14:24 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-12 11:22 ` Yicong Yang
2022-12-12 14:33 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-12 18:17 ` Josh Don
2022-12-13 5:46 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-13 10:06 ` Honglei Wang
2022-12-13 12:24 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-01 8:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/fair: Choose the CPU where short task is running during wake up Chen Yu
2022-12-05 2:36 ` Tianchen Ding
2022-12-05 8:40 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-06 13:02 ` Yicong Yang
2022-12-07 3:54 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y44CdKrQoFKGH+1j@chenyu5-mobl1 \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanghonglei@didichuxing.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®