mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, cascardo@canonical.com, leit@meta.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Explicitly clear speculative MSR bits
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 01:42:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4QD8o8kWb1V4osq@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221124104650.533427-1-leitao@debian.org>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 02:46:50AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Currently x86_spec_ctrl_base is read at boot time, and speculative bits
> are set if configs are enable, such as MSR[SPEC_CTRL_IBRS] is enabled if
> CONFIG_CPU_IBRS_ENTRY is configured. These MSR bits are not cleared if
> the mitigations are disabled.
> 
> This is a problem when kexec-ing a kernel that has the mitigation
> disabled, from a kernel that has the mitigation enabled. In this case,
> the MSR bits are carried forward and not cleared at the boot of the new
> kernel. This might have some performance degradation that is hard to
> find.
> 
> This problem does not happen if the machine is (hard) rebooted, because
> the bit will be cleared by default.
> 
> This patch also defines a SPEC_CTRL_MASK macro, so, we can easily track
> and clear if eventually some new mitigation shows up.

Just remove that sentence - the macro's function is kinda obvious from
the diff itself.

> Suggested-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c       | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 4a2af82553e4..704f49580ee1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
>  #define SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S_SHIFT	6	   /* Disable RRSBA behavior */
>  #define SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S		BIT(SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define SPEC_CTRL_MASK			(SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP | SPEC_CTRL_SSBD \
> +							| SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S)

Call that SPEC_CTRL_MITIGATIONS_MASK or so to denote what it is - a
mask of the SPEC_CTRL bits which the kernel toggles when controlling
mitigations.

A comment above it wouldn't hurt either.

> +
>  #define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD		0x00000049 /* Prediction Command */
>  #define PRED_CMD_IBPB			BIT(0)	   /* Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 3e3230cccaa7..88957da1029b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,15 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
>  	 * have unknown values. AMD64_LS_CFG MSR is cached in the early AMD
>  	 * init code as it is not enumerated and depends on the family.
>  	 */
> -	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL))
> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL)) {
>  		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
> +		/*
> +		 * Previously running software may have some controls turned ON.

"Previously running software, like kexec for example, ..."

> +		 * Clear them and let kernel decide which controls to use.

"Clear them and let the mitigations setup below set them based on configuration."

> +		 */
> +		x86_spec_ctrl_base &= ~SPEC_CTRL_MASK;
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);

So this WRMSR will happen on the BSP only but the SPEC_CTRL MSR is
per-CPU. As is x86_spec_ctrl_current which tracks it.

So I'd say you don't need that WRMSR here - the proper value will get
replicated eventually everywhere...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-24 10:46 Breno Leitao
2022-11-28  0:42 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-11-28 22:03   ` Pawan Gupta
2022-11-28 22:40     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-28 23:02       ` Pawan Gupta
2022-11-28 23:34         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-28 23:37         ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y4QD8o8kWb1V4osq@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=leit@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®