From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, cascardo@canonical.com, leit@meta.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Explicitly clear speculative MSR bits
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 01:42:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4QD8o8kWb1V4osq@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221124104650.533427-1-leitao@debian.org>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 02:46:50AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Currently x86_spec_ctrl_base is read at boot time, and speculative bits
> are set if configs are enable, such as MSR[SPEC_CTRL_IBRS] is enabled if
> CONFIG_CPU_IBRS_ENTRY is configured. These MSR bits are not cleared if
> the mitigations are disabled.
>
> This is a problem when kexec-ing a kernel that has the mitigation
> disabled, from a kernel that has the mitigation enabled. In this case,
> the MSR bits are carried forward and not cleared at the boot of the new
> kernel. This might have some performance degradation that is hard to
> find.
>
> This problem does not happen if the machine is (hard) rebooted, because
> the bit will be cleared by default.
>
> This patch also defines a SPEC_CTRL_MASK macro, so, we can easily track
> and clear if eventually some new mitigation shows up.
Just remove that sentence - the macro's function is kinda obvious from
the diff itself.
> Suggested-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 4a2af82553e4..704f49580ee1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
> #define SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S_SHIFT 6 /* Disable RRSBA behavior */
> #define SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S BIT(SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S_SHIFT)
>
> +#define SPEC_CTRL_MASK (SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP | SPEC_CTRL_SSBD \
> + | SPEC_CTRL_RRSBA_DIS_S)
Call that SPEC_CTRL_MITIGATIONS_MASK or so to denote what it is - a
mask of the SPEC_CTRL bits which the kernel toggles when controlling
mitigations.
A comment above it wouldn't hurt either.
> +
> #define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049 /* Prediction Command */
> #define PRED_CMD_IBPB BIT(0) /* Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 3e3230cccaa7..88957da1029b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,15 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
> * have unknown values. AMD64_LS_CFG MSR is cached in the early AMD
> * init code as it is not enumerated and depends on the family.
> */
> - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL))
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL)) {
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
> + /*
> + * Previously running software may have some controls turned ON.
"Previously running software, like kexec for example, ..."
> + * Clear them and let kernel decide which controls to use.
"Clear them and let the mitigations setup below set them based on configuration."
> + */
> + x86_spec_ctrl_base &= ~SPEC_CTRL_MASK;
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
So this WRMSR will happen on the BSP only but the SPEC_CTRL MSR is
per-CPU. As is x86_spec_ctrl_current which tracks it.
So I'd say you don't need that WRMSR here - the proper value will get
replicated eventually everywhere...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 10:46 Breno Leitao
2022-11-28 0:42 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-11-28 22:03 ` Pawan Gupta
2022-11-28 22:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-28 23:02 ` Pawan Gupta
2022-11-28 23:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-28 23:37 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4QD8o8kWb1V4osq@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leit@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®