mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com>
Cc: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
	"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"parri.andrea@gmail.com" <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk" <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	"luc.maranget@inria.fr" <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	"akiyks@gmail.com" <akiyks@gmail.com>,
	"dlustig@nvidia.com" <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
	"joel@joelfernandes.org" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"urezki@gmail.com" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"quic_neeraju@quicinc.com" <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	"frederic@kernel.org" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: memory-model: Make plain accesses carry dependencies
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 10:20:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4tpPCWyt3zfQljk@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcacee1a2ce84123a664d783d108050e@huawei.com>

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 11:47:06AM +0000, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@rowland.harvard.edu] 
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 9:22 PM
> 
> > > void *y[2];
> > > void *x[2] = { (void*)&y[1], (void*)&y[0] };
> > > 
> > > P0() {
> > >     void **t = (void**)(x[0]);
> 
> > Now t holds a pointer to y[1].
> 
> Unfortunately, this kind of inductive reasoning (arguing about what happens based on what happened "before") is not possible with memory models that allow OOTA; as you put it, one must allow for loads reading from stores that haven't happened yet.
> One such store (I promise!(*)) is a store to x[0] which writes &x[1]. Let's consider the alternative universe where we read from this future store, so now t holds a pointer to x[1].
> 
> > >     *t = (void*)(t-1);
> 
> > And now y[1] holds a pointer to y[0].
> 
> In our alternative universe, x[1] now holds a pointer to x[0].
> 
> 
> > > }
> > > P1() {
> > >     void **u = (void**)(x[1]);	
> 
> > Now u holds a pointer to y[0].
> 
> In our alternative universe, u holds the pointer to x[0] stored by P0().
> 
> > >     *u = (void*)(u+1);
> 
> > And now y[0] holds a pointer to y[1].
> 
> In our alternative universe, now x[0] holds a pointer to x[1]. Behold, the store I promised would happen!
> 
> > > }
> 
> > The contents of x[] never get changed, so there's no question about the values of t and u.
> 
> They might get changed, by the stores *t=... and *u=...

Okay, now I understand.  Yes, this counts as an example of values 
appearing out of thin air, even though the values are constrained.  The 
same sort of thing can happen in a less exotic form, such as:

	P0		P1
	------		-----------
	x = y;		y = x & ~1;

Then in an OOTA execution, x and y can end up holding any _even_ value.  
Yes, constraining a value to be even is less drastic than constraining 
it to be &x[0] as in your example, but it's still a constraint.  One 
can easily extend this example in various directions.

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-03 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-01 12:18 Jonas Oberhauser
2022-12-01 16:02 ` Alan Stern
2022-12-01 17:21   ` Jonas Oberhauser
2022-12-01 20:21     ` Alan Stern
2022-12-02 17:22       ` Jonas Oberhauser
2022-12-02 20:22         ` Alan Stern
2022-12-03 11:47           ` Jonas Oberhauser
2022-12-03 15:20             ` Alan Stern [this message]
2022-12-03 19:04             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y4tpPCWyt3zfQljk@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®