From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] irqdomain: Fix mapping-creation race
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:18:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5NDuV+xb3FZRHAr@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8ppkofy.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:54:25AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Johan,
>
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:28:14 +0100,
> Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Parallel probing (e.g. due to asynchronous probing) of devices that share
> > interrupts can currently result in two mappings for the same hardware
> > interrupt to be created.
> >
> > Add a serialising mapping mutex so that looking for an existing mapping
> > before creating a new one is done atomically.
> >
> > Fixes: 765230b5f084 ("driver-core: add asynchronous probing support for drivers")
> > Fixes: b62b2cf5759b ("irqdomain: Fix handling of type settings for existing mappings")
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YuJXMHoT4ijUxnRb@hovoldconsulting.com
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> I must confess I have a hard time figuring out the semantic difference
> between map_mutex and revmap_mutex. or rather, what is the use of
> revmap_mutex once map_mutex is taken. They fundamentally overlap, and
> I have the feeling one should eventually replace the other.
>
> If anything, you should absolutely define/document how these two locks
> interact.
Sorry about the late follow-up on this. I meant to revisit this much
sooner, but couldn't seem to find the time until this week.
I just sent you a v3 which reworks the irqdomain locking and fixes the
race in the process. In the end the irq_domain_mutex is only used for
managing the irq_domain_list, while domain operations use per-domain
(hierarchy) locking.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 14:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] " Johan Hovold
2022-09-01 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] irqdomain: Look for existing mapping only once Johan Hovold
2022-09-01 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] irqdomain: Fix mapping-creation race Johan Hovold
2022-09-15 8:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-09 14:18 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2022-09-01 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] irqdomain: Fix domain-association race Johan Hovold
2022-09-01 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] irqdomain: use per-domain mutex for associations Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5NDuV+xb3FZRHAr@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=dtor@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®