Re: [PATCH] perf arm64: Fix mksyscalltbl, don't lose syscalls due to sort -nu

[Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>]

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:56:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022, at 13:54, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:53:10PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> 
> >> It looks like this patch was never applied?  AFAICS it is still needed
> >> on current HEAD and it still applies cleanly.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for bringing up this.
> >
> > Before there have a discussion [1] for refactoring Arm64 system call
> > table but it didn't really happen.
> 
> I actually worked on this last week and did a new series to convert
> the old asm-generic/unistd.h header into the syscall.tbl format,
> and change arm64 to use that.
> 
> You can find my work in the 'syscall-tbl' branch of my asm-generic
> tree [1]. This has only seen light build testing so far, and is
> probably still buggy, but most of the work is there. The missing
> bits are the Makefiles for the other seven architectures using
> asm-generic/unistd.h, and checking the output to ensure the
> contents are still the same.

Thanks a lot for sharing the patch set.

I went through the whole patch set, below are several things I observed:

- I did a quick compilation but found building failure, this failure
  is caused by the first patch "arm64: convert unistd_32.h to
  syscall.tbl format", it removes the macro __NR_compat_syscalls.

  In file included from ./include/vdso/const.h:5,
                 from ./include/linux/const.h:4,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:5,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h:5,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h:15,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:14,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:16,
                 from ./include/linux/atomic.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/refcount.h:95,
                 from kernel/seccomp.c:18:
  ./arch/arm64/include/asm/seccomp.h:27:33: error: ‘__NR_compat_syscalls’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘in_compat_syscall’?
     27 | # define SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NR __NR_compat_syscalls
        |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ./include/uapi/linux/const.h:34:40: note: in definition of macro ‘__KERNEL_DIV_ROUND_UP’
     34 | #define __KERNEL_DIV_ROUND_UP(n, d) (((n) + (d) - 1) / (d))
        |                                        ^
  ./include/linux/types.h:11:28: note: in expansion of macro ‘BITS_TO_LONGS’
     11 |         unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)]
        |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
  kernel/seccomp.c:168:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘DECLARE_BITMAP’
    168 |         DECLARE_BITMAP(allow_compat, SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NR);
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  kernel/seccomp.c:168:38: note: in expansion of macro ‘SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NR’
    168 |         DECLARE_BITMAP(allow_compat, SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NR);
        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
- The patch set breaks git bisection, when I use "git bisect" I can
  find more building failures caused by middle patches.

- The patch "arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl" removes macros:

  __ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT
  __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
  __ARCH_WANT_SET_GET_RLIMIT
  __ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS
  __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE3
  __ARCH_WANT_MEMFD_SECRET

  Seems to me we still need to enable these macros so can enable Arm64
  specific system calls?

- We also need to update the header files:
  tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h

You are welcome to CC me when you send out formal patches to mailing
list and I can test it (and look if can refine perf code for this).

Thanks,
Leo