mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com" <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>,
	"linfeilong@huawei.com" <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata:libata-eh:Cleanup ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:54:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5rgrhJuX6xCDEa3@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215050416.1891113-1-haowenchao@huawei.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:04:16PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> If ap->ops->error_handler is NULL, just go out and release the
> spinlock. This patch is just a cleanup, which would not change
> the origin error handle logic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index 34303ce67c14..66ca3ac7cd58 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,8 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
> +	int nr_timedout = 0;
>  
>  	/* make sure sff pio task is not running */
>  	ata_sff_flush_pio_task(ap);
> @@ -584,62 +586,60 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
>  	 * timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed.
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
> -	if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
> -		struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
> -		int nr_timedout = 0;
> -
> -		/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
> -		   a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
> -
> -		   The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
> -		   non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
> -
> -		   We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
> -		   this as if normal completion won the race */
> +	if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
> +		goto out;

Nice cleanup!

However, I don't think there is any point in taking the spin lock if there is
no error_handler.

So I think that you can do similar to the skip_eh label in ata_port_detach():
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/ata/libata-core.c#L5904


Kind regards,
Niklas

>  
> -		if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
> -			ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);
> +	/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
> +	 * a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
> +	 *
> +	 * The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
> +	 * non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
> +	 *
> +	 * We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
> +	 * this as if normal completion won the race
> +	 */
> +	if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
> +		ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
> -			struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
> +		struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>  
> -			ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
> -				if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
> -				    qc->scsicmd == scmd)
> -					break;
> -			}
> +		ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
> +			if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
> +			    qc->scsicmd == scmd)
> +				break;
> +		}
>  
> -			if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
> -				/* the scmd has an associated qc */
> -				if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
> -					/* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
> -					qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
> -					qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
> -					nr_timedout++;
> -				}
> -			} else {
> -				/* Normal completion occurred after
> -				 * SCSI timeout but before this point.
> -				 * Successfully complete it.
> -				 */
> -				scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
> -				scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
> +		if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
> +			/* the scmd has an associated qc */
> +			if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
> +				/* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
> +				qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
> +				qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
> +				nr_timedout++;
>  			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* Normal completion occurred after
> +			 * SCSI timeout but before this point.
> +			 * Successfully complete it.
> +			 */
> +			scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
> +			scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
>  		}
> +	}
>  
> -		/* If we have timed out qcs.  They belong to EH from
> -		 * this point but the state of the controller is
> -		 * unknown.  Freeze the port to make sure the IRQ
> -		 * handler doesn't diddle with those qcs.  This must
> -		 * be done atomically w.r.t. setting QCFLAG_FAILED.
> -		 */
> -		if (nr_timedout)
> -			__ata_port_freeze(ap);
> -
> +	/* If we have timed out qcs.  They belong to EH from
> +	 * this point but the state of the controller is
> +	 * unknown.  Freeze the port to make sure the IRQ
> +	 * handler doesn't diddle with those qcs.  This must
> +	 * be done atomically w.r.t. setting QCFLAG_FAILED.
> +	 */
> +	if (nr_timedout)
> +		__ata_port_freeze(ap);
>  
> -		/* initialize eh_tries */
> -		ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
> -	}
> +	/* initialize eh_tries */
> +	ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
> +out:
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
>  
>  }
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-15  5:04 Wenchao Hao
2022-12-15  8:54 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2022-12-15  9:19   ` Wenchao Hao
2022-12-15 10:09 Wenchao Hao
2022-12-15 10:57 ` Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5rgrhJuX6xCDEa3@x1-carbon \
    --to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=haowenchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®