From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com,
ndesaulniers@google.com, wqu@suse.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: handle -Wmaybe-uninitialized with clang
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:02:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y68nyfHNXieotO+C@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221230175507.1630431-1-trix@redhat.com>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:55:07PM -0500, Tom Rix wrote:
> The clang build reports this error
> error: unknown warning option '-Wmaybe-uninitialized'; did you mean '-Wuninitialized'? [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option]
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
>
> -Wmaybe-uninitialized is a gcc only flag. Move to setting with cc-option.
>
> Fixes: 1b19c4c249a1 ("btrfs: turn on -Wmaybe-uninitialized")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Thanks for the patch! Looks like I forgot to double back to this...
https://lore.kernel.org/Y6kgR4qnb23UdAEX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/Makefile | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/Makefile b/fs/btrfs/Makefile
> index eca995abccdf..460eced3f5bd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/Makefile
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-format-attribute
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-prototypes
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wold-style-definition
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-include-dirs
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> condflags := \
> $(call cc-option, -Wunused-but-set-variable) \
> $(call cc-option, -Wunused-const-variable) \
> $(call cc-option, -Wpacked-not-aligned) \
> - $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-truncation)
> + $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-truncation) \
> + $(call cc-option, -Wmaybe-uninitialized)
> subdir-ccflags-y += $(condflags)
> # The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
> --
> 2.27.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-30 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-30 17:55 Tom Rix
2022-12-30 18:02 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-01-02 12:05 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y68nyfHNXieotO+C@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®